ClinicalTrials.Veeva

Menu

Post-extubation Use RAM Cannula Versus Short Binasal Prong Interfaces in Preterm Infants

M

Ministry of Health, Saudi Arabia

Status

Not yet enrolling

Conditions

Respiratory Distress Syndrome
Premature
Extubation

Treatments

Other: RAM cannula
Other: Short binasal prong

Study type

Interventional

Funder types

Other

Identifiers

NCT07113535
H-03-M-11

Details and patient eligibility

About

Nowadays, the use of non-invasive ventilation for preterm infants in the NICU has increased to avoid complications associated with prolonged endotracheal intubation. Adequate pressure delivery through non-invasive ventilation is essential, as it enhances the growth and development of premature lungs. Various interfaces have been used to ensure proper sealing. The RAM cannula, used as an interface for non-invasive respiratory support in preterm neonates, is associated with reduced nasal trauma compared to short binasal prongs (SBPs), due to its softer material, making it a safer option. However, the RAM cannula has been shown to deliver lower pharyngeal pressure and, therefore, may not maintain airway pressure as consistently as nasal prongs. Currently, limited data is available regarding the efficacy of nasal prongs compared to the RAM cannula as a post-extubation interface for non-invasive ventilation support in preterm infants. Additionally, we have observed that the use of the RAM cannula for non-invasive ventilation in preterm infants is associated with a longer duration of oxygen therapy compared to SBPs.

The investigators hypothesize that the RAM cannula provides a lower level of positive end-expiratory pressure compared to SBPs during non-invasive ventilation.

The investigators aim to assess the efficacy and safety of the RAM cannula versus SBPs as nasal interfaces for post-extubation non-invasive respiratory support in preterm infants.

Full description

Preterm infants will be randomized to receive post-extubation non invasive respiratory support either through RAM cannula or SBPs. Neonates in both groups will be uniformly managed as per unit protocol as following:

Extubation criteria :

  • Birth weight < 1000 gram :MAP <7 cmH2O and FIO2 <0.30
  • Birth weight>1000 gram :MAP >8 cmH2O and FIO2 <0.30

Re intubation criteria :

  • FIO2>0.60 to maintain SaO2 >88% OR PaO2 > 45 mmHg
  • PaCO2 {arterial} > 55-60 with PH < 7.25
  • Apnea and requiring bag and mask ventilation
  • Evidence of increased work of breathing {retractions -grunting -chest wall distortion } plus abnormal chest x ray

Enrollment

90 estimated patients

Sex

All

Ages

24 hours to 28 days old

Volunteers

No Healthy Volunteers

Inclusion criteria

  • Inborn preterm neonates ≤ 32 weeks of gestational and/or birth weight ≤1500 g with respiratory distress syndrome requiring initial invasive ventilation support for at least 24 hours.

Exclusion criteria

  • Outborn preterm neonates
  • Major congenital malformations.

Trial design

Primary purpose

Prevention

Allocation

Randomized

Interventional model

Parallel Assignment

Masking

Single Blind

90 participants in 2 patient groups

RAM cannula group
Active Comparator group
Description:
Preterm infants will receive non-invasive ventilation by RAM cannula
Treatment:
Other: RAM cannula
Short binasal prong group
Active Comparator group
Description:
Preterm infants will receive non-invasive ventilation by short binasal prongs
Treatment:
Other: Short binasal prong

Trial contacts and locations

1

Loading...

Central trial contact

Ohoud Almoualled, Dr; Nehad Nasef, Dr

Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov

Clinical trials

Find clinical trialsTrials by location
© Copyright 2026 Veeva Systems