Post-Neoadjuvant Treatment MRI Based AI System to Predict pCR for Rectal Cancer (MR-AI-pCR)

Sun Yat-sen University

Status: Enrolling

Conditions: Rectal Cancer

Treatments: Procedure: the radiologists; Procedure: artificial intelligence prediction system

Study type: Observational

Funder types: Other

Identifiers

NCT04278274

MR-AI-pCR 2020

Details and patient eligibility

About

In this study, investigators seek for a better way to identify the potential pathologic complete response (pCR) patients form non-pCR patients with locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC), based on their post-neoadjuvant treatment Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) data.

Previously, a post neoadjuvant treatment MRI based radiomics AI model had been constructed and trained. Here, the predictive power of this artificial intelligence system and expert radiologist to identify pCR patients from non-pCR LARC patients will be compared in this prospective, multicenter, back-to-back clinical study

Full description

This is a multicenter, prospective, observational clinical study for seeking out a better way to predict the pathologic complete response (pCR) in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) based on the post-neoadjuvant treatment Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) data. Patients who have been pathologically diagnosed as rectal adenocarcinoma and defined as clinical II-III stage will be enrolled from the Sixth Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital and the Third Affiliated Hospital of Kunming Medical College. All participants should follow a standard treatment protocol, including neoadjuvant treatment, total mesorectum excision (TME) surgery. Patients with LARC who received neoadjuvant treatment will be enrolled and their post-neoadjuvant treatment MRI images will be used to predict their pathologic response (pCR vs. non-pCR). The artificial intelligence prediction system and the expert radiologist will define the pathologic response as pCR or non-pCR, respectively. The pathologist will provide the final pathology report of TME surgery specimen (pCR or non-pCR) as a standard. The predictive efficacy of these two back-to-back approaches generated will be compared in this multicenter, prospective clinical study.

Enrollment: 205 estimated patients

Sex: All

Ages: 18 to 75 years old

Volunteers: No Healthy Volunteers

Inclusion criteria

• pathologically diagnosed as rectal adenocarcinoma
• defined as clinical II-III staging (≥T3, and/or positive nodal status) without distant metastasis
• receive neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy or chemotherapy
• pre- and post-neoadjuvant treatment MRI data obtained
• receive total mesorectum excision (TME) surgery after neoadjuvant therapy and get the pathologic assessment of tumor response

Exclusion criteria

• with history of other cancer
• insufficient imaging quality of MRI to delineate tumor volume or obtain measurements (e.g., lack of sequence, motion artifacts)
• not completing neoadjuvant chemotherapy or chemoradiotherapy
• tumor recurrence or distant metastasis during neoadjuvant treatment
• not undergoing surgery resulting in lack of pathologic assessment of tumor response

Trial design

205 participants in 1 patient group

patients will be evaluated by artificial intelligence system and expert radiologist

Description:

the patients with locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) finished the neoadjuvant treatment, and not yet receive total mesorectum excision (TME) surgery will be enrolled. The post-neoadjuvant treatment MRI images features of each enrolled patients will be captured by the artificial intelligence system, and evaluated by experienced radiologists as well. Blind to the pathologic report of TME specimen, both approaches further respectively yield a predicted pathologic response to neoadjuvant treatment for each enrolled patient, shown as pCR or non-pCR.

Treatment:

Procedure: artificial intelligence prediction system

Procedure: the radiologists