Status
Conditions
Treatments
About
To determine the safety and efficacy of 2 vs 4 cycles of postconditioning method during primary PCI and direct stenting in acute MI, and to compared to primary PCI and direct stenting without the postconditioning.
Full description
Sample size: 45 subjects
Site Locations: Sheba medical center
Patients: Patients presenting with an acute MI with onset of symptoms 6h, and planned to undergo primary PCI will be included. The target lesion should be located in the proximal or middle segment of a main native coronary artery, and should be suitable for percutaneous intervention.
Primary Objective: To determine the safety and efficacy of 2 vs 4 cycles of postconditioning method during primary PCI and direct stenting in acute MI, and to compared to primary PCI and direct stenting without the postconditioning.
Primary Endpoint:
Secondary endpoints:
Methods:
Follow-up:
Sex
Ages
Volunteers
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Primary purpose
Allocation
Interventional model
Masking
Loading...
Central trial contact
Victor Guetta, MD; Elad Maor, MD
Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov
Clinical trials
Research sites
Resources
Legal