Status
Conditions
Treatments
About
This randomized controlled trial compares posterior minimally invasive correction surgery with conventional posterior spinal fusion for children with paralytic scoliosis and severe pelvic obliquity following spinal cord injury. Conventional posterior spinal fusion is widely used for severe neuromuscular or paralytic scoliosis but is associated with substantial surgical trauma, blood loss, transfusion requirements, and perioperative morbidity. The minimally invasive approach uses limited posterior incisions, posterior instrumentation, and spinopelvic fixation with second sacral alar-iliac screws. The study will evaluate whether minimally invasive surgery provides comparable correction of pelvic obliquity and spinal deformity while reducing perioperative surgical burden, complications, hospital stay, and medical costs.
Full description
Paralytic scoliosis following spinal cord injury in childhood is a specific subtype of neuromuscular scoliosis. Patients are often nonambulatory and may develop progressive long C-shaped thoracolumbar or lumbar curves, severe pelvic obliquity, impaired sitting balance, pain, hip dysplasia or subluxation, and functional limitation of the upper limbs due to the need for hand support while sitting. Surgical treatment aims to restore sitting balance, level the pelvis, improve trunk alignment, reduce pain caused by imbalance, and preserve or improve functional independence.
Conventional posterior spinal fusion can correct spinal deformity and pelvic obliquity but usually requires extensive posterior exposure and long-segment fusion, which may increase operative time, blood loss, transfusion volume, wound complications, intensive care unit admission, and hospitalization costs. A posterior minimally invasive correction technique using limited incisions and spinopelvic fixation may reduce surgical trauma while maintaining adequate deformity correction.
This is a prospective, single-center, randomized, parallel-group controlled trial. Eligible participants will be randomized in a 1:1 ratio to receive either posterior minimally invasive correction surgery or conventional posterior spinal fusion. Radiographic outcomes, including pelvic obliquity angle, coronal Cobb angle, regional kyphosis, and coronal balance, will be assessed preoperatively, postoperatively, and during follow-up. Perioperative outcomes, complications, reoperations, health-related quality of life, and medical costs will also be recorded.
The study protocol was approved by the institutional ethics committee before participant enrollment. The trial was registered after enrollment had begun because of an administrative oversight. No interim efficacy analysis was performed before trial registration.
Enrollment
Sex
Ages
Volunteers
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Primary purpose
Allocation
Interventional model
Masking
39 participants in 2 patient groups
Loading...
Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov
Clinical trials
Research sites
Resources
Legal