Status
Conditions
Treatments
About
This prospective clinical study aimed to evaluate the postoperative effects of temporary phrenic nerve paralysis induced by intraoperative phrenic nerve crush during lung resection surgery. The study compared postoperative pulmonary function, diaphragm activity, and clinical outcomes between patients who underwent intraoperative phrenic nerve crush and those who did not. The objective was to assess the reversibility, safety, and clinical impact of temporary phrenic nerve paralysis in relation to postoperative residual pleural space and prolonged air leak.
Full description
This prospective observational study was conducted at the University of Health Sciences, Konya City Hospital, Department of Thoracic Surgery, between September 2019 and March 2023. The study included patients who underwent lung resection surgery via muscle-sparing thoracotomy. In the intervention group, a controlled intraoperative phrenic nerve crush was applied to induce temporary phrenic nerve paralysis. In the control group, no phrenic nerve manipulation was performed.
The primary objective was to evaluate the postoperative effects and reversibility of temporary phrenic nerve paralysis using diaphragm electromyography (EMG) and pulmonary function tests (FEV1, FVC). Secondary objectives included the assessment of residual pleural space filling, prolonged air leak, chest tube duration, and length of hospital stay. The study also aimed to determine whether temporary phrenic nerve paralysis could help minimize postoperative residual pleural space and prolonged air leak without causing permanent functional impairment.
Ethical approval for the study was obtained from the Necmettin Erbakan University Faculty of Medicine Ethics Committee (approval number: NEU2019-1421). Written informed consent was obtained from all participants prior to enrollment.
Enrollment
Sex
Ages
Volunteers
Inclusion criteria
Adult patients (18+) who underwent lobectomy via muscle sparing thoracotomy
Exclusion criteria
Primary purpose
Allocation
Interventional model
Masking
55 participants in 2 patient groups
Loading...
Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov
Clinical trials
Research sites
Resources
Legal