Status
Conditions
Treatments
Study type
Funder types
Identifiers
About
The main purpose of this study is to examine if there are differences in postoperative inflammation following percutaneous dilatation tracheostomy versus surgical tracheostomy in intensive care unit patients.
Full description
Are there differences between the two arms in plasma concentrations of inflammatory mediators (TNF-alfa, interleukin 1, 6, 10) at 24 hrs following the start of the surgical procedure? Are there differences between the two arms in the incidence of postoperative complications (i.e. bleeding, incidence of stomal infections, tracheal tube dislocation, airway compromisation), postoperative pulmonary infection (during the stay in the ICU) and pulmonary function (FEV1, dynamic complicance, oxygen demand, time to weaning off the ventilator: all measured daily during the ICU-stay), postoperative mobilization (time to mobilization to sitting, standing and walking, respectively)?
Enrollment
Sex
Ages
Volunteers
Inclusion and exclusion criteria
Inclusion Criteria: Patients in whom a tracheostomy is indicated (i.e. anticipated need of mechanical ventilation for >7 days or anticipated risk for complicated extubation, e.g. anatomical signs of a compromised airway, reduced level of consciousness. Adults over 18 years. Participants who are suitable for both surgery techniques.
Exclusion Criteria:
Children under 18 years, pregnancy and participants with anatomical defects that exclude them from percutaneous dilatation tracheostomy.
Primary purpose
Allocation
Interventional model
Masking
150 participants in 2 patient groups
Loading...
Central trial contact
Ulrika H Skoog, PTh; Markus Castegren, MD, PhD
Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov
Clinical trials
Research sites
Resources
Legal