ClinicalTrials.Veeva

Menu

Postoperative Pain and Swelling After Flap vsFlapless Technique For Mandibular Third Molar Surgery

W

Watim Medical & Dental College

Status

Enrolling

Conditions

Pain (Visceral, Somatic, or Neuropathic)

Treatments

Procedure: flapless technquie arm b
Procedure: flap technqiue for mandibular third molar extraction Arm A

Study type

Interventional

Funder types

Other

Identifiers

NCT07247929
WMC-OMFS-FLAPvsFLAPLESS-2025

Details and patient eligibility

About

This randomized controlled trial evaluates postoperative pain and facial swelling following surgical removal of partially impacted mandibular third molars using flap versus flapless techniques. The aim is to determine which method results in lower postoperative morbidity on the second postoperative day.

Full description

Impacted mandibular third molars frequently require surgical extraction, often involving mucoperiosteal flap elevation and bone removal. These steps may contribute to postoperative complications such as pain, swelling, and trismus. Minimally invasive alternatives, including flapless extraction, aim to reduce surgical trauma.

This study compares postoperative pain and swelling after flap versus flapless techniques in patients with partially impacted mesioangular mandibular third molars. Pain will be assessed using a 10-point Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), and swelling will be measured using standardized anthropometric facial measurements. A total of 160 participants will be randomized into two equal groups. All procedures will be performed by a single surgeon to reduce bias.

Enrollment

160 estimated patients

Sex

All

Ages

18 to 45 years old

Volunteers

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Inclusion criteria

  • Age 18-45 years

    • Either gender
    • Partially impacted mesioangular mandibular third molar confirmed clinically and radiographically
    • Second episode of pericoronitis
    • Swelling present on the affected side
    • No bone recession or periodontal disease on radiograph

Exclusion criteria

  • HIV or HBV infection

    • Diabetes or other metabolic disorders
    • Bleeding disorders including von Willebrand disease, thalassemia, hemophilia, thrombocytosis, or thrombocytopenia
    • Periapical infection or acute pericoronitis at time of surgery
    • Severe trismus
    • Immunocompromised status

Trial design

Primary purpose

Treatment

Allocation

Randomized

Interventional model

Parallel Assignment

Masking

None (Open label)

160 participants in 2 patient groups

flap technqiue
Experimental group
Description:
Surgical extraction with mucoperiosteal flap elevation, bone guttering, tooth sectioning, and suturing.
Treatment:
Procedure: flap technqiue for mandibular third molar extraction Arm A
flapless technquie
Experimental group
Description:
Surgical extraction without flap elevation, minimal gingival reflection, bone guttering, and no suturing.
Treatment:
Procedure: flapless technquie arm b

Trial contacts and locations

1

Loading...

Central trial contact

dr huma bajar huma bajar, bds

Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov

Clinical trials

Find clinical trialsTrials by location
© Copyright 2026 Veeva Systems