Status
Conditions
Treatments
About
The objective of this study is to compare the incidence of postoperative urinary retention related to spinal anesthesia with morphine and spinal anesthesia associated with peripheral blockade in orthopedic procedures of lower limbs. Secondary objectives are assessing the incidence of nausea and vomiting; postoperative pain and opioid consumption at 24 hours after surgery with each of the techniques. A total of 52 patients submitted to a lower limb orthopedic procedure were randomized to the intervention groups: spinal anesthesia with morphine versus spinal anesthesia without opioid associated with peripheral nerve block. After surgery, bladder ultrasound will be performed in post-anesthesia care unit to identify urinary retention and patients will be followed for 24 hours to assess outcomes.
Full description
This is a randomized clinical trial with simple blinding (the outcome evaluator is blind). Approved by the Ethics and Research Committee of Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre under number 20160043 and Plataforma Brasil CAAE 57623815.1.0000.5327.To calculate the sample size, the program WinPEPI, version 11.43, was used. Considering 80% power, 5% significance level and data reported by Tomaszewski, Balkota and Machowicz (RUPO incidence of 42.86% of the spinal anesthesia group with morphine requiring urinary catheterization and 6.25% in patients undergoing peripheral nerve block ). The sample size found was 26 subjects in each group.
Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS STATISTICS software version 23. Absolute and percentage frequencies were calculated for qualitative variables. And mean, standard deviation and interquartile range for quantitative variables. The normality of the quantitative variables was assessed by the Shapiro-Wilk test. The chi-square test was used to assess the difference in the incidence of catheterization in the two groups and the incidence of nausea and vomiting in 24 hours. To evaluate the difference in the mean time to urination, even after sounding, the Student's t test for independent samples was used. Doses of codeine and morphine at 24 hours and assessment of pain on movement and rest at 12 and 24 hours (by the visual analog scale of pain) were assessed by the Mann Whitney test.
P <0.05 was considered statistically significant. The 52 patients included in the survey were allocated randomly to one of the study groups. Randomization was performed immediately before the interventions studied using the electronic random allocation application Randomizer for Clinical Trial for iPad / iPhone, developed by the company Medsharing (http://www.ecrfmedsharing.com/iphone_ipad_randomization.php).
All patients received spinal anesthesia. The technique included sterile preparation of the puncture site at the L3-L4 or L4-L5 level using Whitacre 27G or 25G needles. Group 1 patients received subarachnoid block with 20 mg of hyperbaric bupivacaine + 200 mcg of morphine and group 2 patients received subarachnoid block with 20 mg of hyperbaric bupivacaine and peripheral nerve block.Peripheral nerve blocks were performed after spinal anesthesia, before the start of the surgical procedure under ultrasound visualization associated with the use of neurostimulator. The choice of the nerve to be blocked was based on the innervation related to analgesia of the surgical site: femoral nerve block or sciatic nerve.
In the post-anesthetic care unit, the following parameters were assessed:
Patients were evaluated at 12 and 24 hours after the surgical procedure for:
The postoperative prescription was standardized:
Enrollment
Sex
Ages
Volunteers
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Primary purpose
Allocation
Interventional model
Masking
52 participants in 2 patient groups
Loading...
Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov
Clinical trials
Research sites
Resources
Legal