Status
Conditions
Treatments
Study type
Funder types
Identifiers
About
This trial wants to address high unmet need for postpartum family planning (PPFP) in Rwanda. A previous pilot study tested the intervention (informed by formative work with couples/clients, clinic providers, champions, and community health workers), which significantly increased the use of PPFP in government clinics. This study now proposes to use an implementation science framework to test the hypothesis that the proposed PPFP intervention is adaptable to large-scale implementation, cost-effective, and sustainable. This PPFP could dramatically reduce unintended pregnancy and abortion and improve birth spacing and maternal and newborn health.
Full description
In 2017-2018, the study team worked closely with the Rwanda Ministry of Health (MOH) to develop and pilot test a theory-based, multi-level intervention targeting postpartum family planning (PPFP) supply and demand in 4 government health facilities in Kigali, the capital. This innovative PPFP intervention was informed by clients, clinic providers, champions, and Community Health Workers. Long-acting reversible contraceptives (LARC), the intrauterine device (PPIUD) and implant, are fundamental to PPFP programs. LARCs are highly effective and are the only reversible methods that may be safely used in early postpartum period by breastfeeding women. During the pilot, LARC uptake among postpartum women increased significantly (172% for PP implant, 2,687% for PPIUD), PPFP feasibility and acceptability were high among providers and clients, and side-effects were rare.
The study team now proposes to use an implementation science framework to evaluate the effectiveness of different PPFP demand creation strategies and test the hypothesis that our PPFP intervention is adaptable to large-scale implementation, cost-effective, and sustainable. In a Type 2 effectiveness-implementation hybrid study, we will evaluate facility organizational readiness prior to implementing the PPFP intervention in a clinic randomized trial in 10 high-volume health facilities in Kigali, Rwanda (Aim 1). Adaptability and sustainability within government facilities is a critical aspect of the proposal, and the MOH and other local stakeholders will be engaged from the outset. It is expected that this project will deliver PPFP counseling to over 21,000 women/couples during the project period. They will then evaluate the PPFP intervention effectiveness and implementation processes using RE-AIM (Aim 2). The team hypothesizes that the PPFP intervention will significantly increase the number of stakeholders engaged, PPFP providers and promoters, couples/clients receiving information about PPFP (reach), and LARC uptake (effectiveness) comparing intervention versus standard of care. It is expected that PPFP client satisfaction will be high and side-effects will be rare. The independent effectiveness of each demand creation strategy on LARC uptake will be estimated. Assessment of measures of PPFP intervention adoption, implementation, and maintenance at the patient-, provider- and stakeholder-level to assess PPFP intervention sustainability will be completed by the study team. Finally, this project will evaluate PPFP intervention cost-effectiveness and develop a national costed implementation plan to guide Rwandan MOH decision-making for nationwide roll-out of PPFP services (Aim 3). This trial hypothesizes that the PPFP intervention will be cost-saving relative to standard of care.
This intervention represents an important contribution to the Rwanda Family Planning 2020 goals and the MOH are enthusiastic to see our successful pilot efforts expanded to a larger number of facilities for greater and sustained impact. The new PPFP implementation model is designed to be replicable and expandable to other countries in the region which similarly have high unmet need for PPFP.
Enrollment
Sex
Volunteers
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Primary purpose
Allocation
Interventional model
Masking
26,215 participants in 2 patient groups
Loading...
Central trial contact
Amanda Tichacek, MPH; Kristin Wall, PhD
Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov
Clinical trials
Research sites
Resources
Legal