ClinicalTrials.Veeva

Menu

Poul Gjessing Versus T Loops for Orthodontic Maxillary Canine Retraction

A

Al-Azhar University

Status

Active, not recruiting

Conditions

Canine Retraction

Treatments

Device: Poul Gjessing
Device: T loops

Study type

Interventional

Funder types

Other

Identifiers

NCT05727124
790/2251

Details and patient eligibility

About

Poul Gjessing versus T loops for orthodontic maxillary canine

Full description

Split mouth study one side using Poul Gjessing spring and other side using T loops

Enrollment

20 estimated patients

Sex

All

Ages

12 to 25 years old

Volunteers

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Inclusion criteria

    • Class I or II div 1, orthodontic patients, with moderate to severe crowding who are indicated for maxillary first premolar extraction. 2- All permanent teeth are erupted (3rd molars are not included). 3- Good oral and general health. 4- No previous orthodontic treatment.

Exclusion criteria

  • 1- Orthodontic cases that could be treated with no indication for extraction therapy.

2- Orthodontic cases that are indicate for the extraction of any tooth other than maxillary first premolars. 3- Patients with systemic diseases that might interfere with the of orthodontic tooth movement.

Trial design

Primary purpose

Treatment

Allocation

Randomized

Interventional model

Parallel Assignment

Masking

None (Open label)

20 participants in 2 patient groups

Evaluation of Poul Gjessing spring for orthodontic maxillary canine retraction
Active Comparator group
Description:
20 Orthodontic patient treated by Poul Gjessing spring for canine retraction split mouth.
Treatment:
Device: Poul Gjessing
Evaluation of T loop for orthodontic maxillary canine retraction
Active Comparator group
Description:
20 Orthodontic patient treated by T loop for canine retraction split mouth
Treatment:
Device: T loops

Trial contacts and locations

1

Loading...

Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov

Clinical trials

Find clinical trialsTrials by location
© Copyright 2025 Veeva Systems