ClinicalTrials.Veeva

Menu

Pregnant Obese Women and Fetal Ultrasound Quality. (EPOWUS)

U

University Hospital, Clermont-Ferrand

Status

Completed

Conditions

Pregnant Women
Obese Women

Treatments

Device: ultrasound propagation velocities, ultrasound fetal quality

Study type

Interventional

Funder types

Other

Identifiers

NCT04212234
2018-A03478-47 (Other Identifier)
PHRC IR 2018 DELABAERE

Details and patient eligibility

About

Ultrasound (US) image construction uses equations that contain the value of the propagation velocity of sound waves; this velocity is assumed conventionally to be constant and equal to 1540 m/s in the human body. Since 1977, all manufacturers of US scanners have used this value, which was first established in 1950. In fatty tissue, however, the actual propagation velocity is only in the order of 1450 m/s. US velocity in fat tissue is slower than in other soft tissues (ie:1450 m/s vs 1540 m/s) therefore the intrinsic image quality in terms of sharpness and precision is improved when considering this parameter for image construction The main objective of this study is to evaluate the impact of ultrasound propagation velocity setting on completeness of ultrasound exams and images quality during the second and third trimester fetal ultrasound examination in obese patients.

Full description

Obese pregnant women will be included before the second trimester fetal ultrasound examination.

Women will be allocated to one intervention group or to the control group. In the intervention group, the ultrasonographer will be able to use several ultrasound propagation velocities to perform the exam.

In the control group, exam will be performed using the conventional ultrasound velocity.

An exam will be considered to be complete if all the images recommended by national guideline are acquired. If ultrasound images are missing, other ultrasound exams may be performed until completeness is reached.

The protocol will be applied for the second and the third fetal ultrasound examination which are recommended by national guideline.

All scans will be evaluated by two independent experts who do not have performed any of the exams. They will evaluate the completeness of each exam. Each scan will be quoted using the quality score proposed by Salomon et al.

Enrollment

596 patients

Sex

Female

Ages

18 to 50 years old

Volunteers

No Healthy Volunteers

Inclusion criteria

  • Body mass index>30
  • Between 20 and 25 weeks of gestation

Exclusion criteria

  • Multiple pregnancy
  • Uterine scare

Trial design

Primary purpose

Diagnostic

Allocation

Randomized

Interventional model

Parallel Assignment

Masking

Double Blind

596 participants in 2 patient groups

free ultrasound propagation velocity
Experimental group
Description:
ultrasound exams will be performed using several ultrasound propagation velocities
Treatment:
Device: ultrasound propagation velocities, ultrasound fetal quality
conventional ultrasound propagation velocity
No Intervention group
Description:
ultrasound exams will be performed using the 1540m/s conventional celerity

Trial contacts and locations

5

Loading...

Central trial contact

Amélie Delabaere, Study Cordonnator Investigator; Lise Laclautre

Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov

Clinical trials

Find clinical trialsTrials by location
© Copyright 2026 Veeva Systems