Status and phase
Conditions
Treatments
About
Promising result of intra-arrest cooling on neurological intact survival in cardiac arrest patients has recently been published in the PRINCE-study in Circulation 2010.
The main purpose of this study is to determine whether prehospital intra-nasal cooling initiated during resuscitation, in addition to systemic cooling at hospital, increases neurological intact survival measured as cerebral performance category score (CPC-score)at 90 days in witnessed cardiac arrests outside hospital.
Full description
Background:
The RhinoChill Device is a non-invasive, portable cooling device through which rapid cooling is achieved via the trans-nasal delivery of an evaporative coolant into the nasopharynx. Animal studies suggest a life-saving benefit for intra-arrest cooling.
Results from a European multicenter randomized trial (PRINCE - Pre Rosc Intra Nasal Cooling Effectiveness), published in Circulation in August 2010, demonstrate that intra-arrest trans-nasal evaporative cooling can be used safely and effectively in prehospital cardiac arrest without interfering with advanced cardiac life support protocols.
The outcome results among patients admitted to hospital showed a trend towards improved survival to hospital discharge in the treatment group (43.8% versus 31.0, p=0.26). The difference in neurologically intact survival was 34.4% vs 21.4%). In the subgroup of patients where cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) was started by Emergency Medical Services personnel within 10 minutes (78 % of total number of patients) the difference in total survival between the groups was (56.5 versus 29.4, p=0.03). Neurologically intact survival for the corresponding subgroup was 43.5% vs 17.6%. In the treatment group, time to tympanic temperature of 34º was reached 3 hours faster (102 min versus 291 min, p=0.03) and time to core temperature 2 hours faster (155 min versus 284 min, p=0.13).
This study is powered to detect clinically significant changes in neurologically intact survival at 90 days after cardiac arrest. An interim analysis for safety and futility will be performed by an external committee after the first 200 patients have provided endpoint data. Conditional power for meeting the primary endpoint will if needed, be computed at that time, and if the interim results do not correspond to the primary endpoint, termination of the study for futility will be considered. Early stopping for efficacy reasons will only be considered if major outcome differences are seen between the groups according to the Haybittle rule with a p-value ≤0,001.
Intention to treat and per protocol analyses will be performed for all randomized patients. No imputed values will be used for patients for whom data is not available.
Stratified analyses will be performed for patients whose first recorded rhythm is VF/VT versus those in whom the first recorded rhythm is PEA or asystole. Stratification analyses will be performed for subjects where CPR was initiated within 10 minutes by a first responder. Stratified analyses will also be performed for subjects in the treatment group where cooling was started within 15 minutes.
Besides the specific endpoints listed below, substudies will be made to assess the following specific endpoints:
Enrollment
Sex
Ages
Volunteers
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Primary purpose
Allocation
Interventional model
Masking
700 participants in 2 patient groups
Loading...
Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov
Clinical trials
Research sites
Resources
Legal