ClinicalTrials.Veeva

Menu

Preparing and Timing of the Endometrium in Modified Natural Cycle Frozen-thawed Embryo Transfers

A

Anja Bisgaard Pinborg

Status and phase

Completed
Phase 4

Conditions

Infertility

Treatments

Drug: Lutinus + transfer day 7
Drug: No Lutinus + transfer day 7
Drug: Lutinus + transfer day 6
Drug: No Lutinus + transfer day 6

Study type

Interventional

Funder types

Other

Identifiers

NCT03795220
2018-002207-34 (EudraCT Number)
63569

Details and patient eligibility

About

The increasing use of FET emphasizes the importance of preparing and timing the endometrium in FET cycles, however there is no consensus on luteal phase progesterone supplementation in mNC-FET and the optimal day of blastocyst warming and transfer. The aim of this multicenter RCT is to assess the effect of progesterone supplementation in hCG-triggered mNC-FET and the effect of embryo thawing and transfer at hCG+6 or hCG+7 days, respectively. In total 604 patients will be included with n=151 in each of the four study arms. The primary outcome is live birth rate per transfer (LBR) and the goal is to show a 10% increase in LBR after progesterone supplementation and to assess whether blastocyst warming+transfer 6 days after hCG trigger is superior to 7 days after hCG trigger in mNC-FET.

Full description

Single embryo transfer and freezing of surplus embryos has lowered twin birth rates after in vitro fertilization (IVF) to a level of less than 5% in Denmark. However, several treatments with repeated frozen embryo transfers (FET) before a viable pregnancy is confirmed are burdensome to the patients. New freezing techniques has optimized the quality of the embryo transferred in FET cycles, but optimization of the endometrium in the luteal phase is still lacking behind. In a mNC-FET, which is the routine in many clinics, ovulation is induced with an hCG injection when the leading follicle is ≥17 mm. The hCG trigger is important for controlling the time of ovulation, but triggering an unhealthy follicle at an inappropriate time may cause luteal phase insufficiency and thus suboptimal function of the endometrium. Danish public fertility clinics are not routinely using progesterone supplementation in mNC-FET, but there may be a rationale to do so, and some implantations may be rescued. In this study we will compare live birth rates in mNC-FET with and without progesterone supplementation in the luteal phase, and further we will explore the optimal timing of blastocyst warming and transfer by comparing embryo transfer at hCG trigger +6 days versus +7 days. This is a superiority study with the aim to detect an increase in live birth rates of 10%. Hence, this adequately powered RCT may make a major contribution to knowledge on mNC-FET to the benefits of patients. We will include 604 patients divided 1:1 (302:302) in each arm +/- progesterone and these will further be divided 1:1 in blastocyst warming and transfer +6 and +7 days after hCG injection. The primary endpoint is live birth rate per transfer.

Enrollment

679 patients

Sex

Female

Ages

18 to 41 years old

Volunteers

No Healthy Volunteers

Inclusion criteria

  • Female age 18-41 years, regular menstrual cycle (23-35 days), vitrified blastocysts derived from 1.-3. IVF/ICSI cycle in a public hospital and undergoing single blastocyst transfer.

Exclusion criteria

  • Previous participation in the study, uterine malformations, intrauterine polyps or submucosal myomas, breast feeding, oocyte donation, preimplantation genetic testing, blastocyst conceived with sperm from testicular sperm aspiration, HIV (woman), hepatitis B and C (woman), known luteal phase insufficiency or if patients are not fulfilling the inclusion criteria. Further exclusion criteria are the following contraindications to progesterone; allergy to the study medication, undiagnosed vaginal bleeding, current missed abortion or ectopic pregnancy, hepatic insufficiency or severe hepatic disease, genital or breast cancer, arterial or venous thromboembolism, thrombophlebitis or porphyria. For patients participating in the sub-study, thyroid disease is an exclusion criterion.

Trial design

Primary purpose

Treatment

Allocation

Randomized

Interventional model

Parallel Assignment

Masking

Single Blind

679 participants in 4 patient groups

Vaginal progesterone + transfer 6. day
Active Comparator group
Description:
Lutinus + blastocyst warming and transfer 6 days after hCG trigger
Treatment:
Drug: Lutinus + transfer day 6
Vaginal progesterone + transfer 7. day
Active Comparator group
Description:
Lutinus + blastocyst warming and transfer 7 days after hCG trigger
Treatment:
Drug: Lutinus + transfer day 7
No progesterone + transfer 6. day
Active Comparator group
Description:
No Lutinus + blastocyst warming and transfer 6 days after hCG trigger
Treatment:
Drug: No Lutinus + transfer day 6
No progesterone + transfer 7. day
Active Comparator group
Description:
No Lutinus + blastocyst warming and transfer 7 days after hCG trigger
Treatment:
Drug: No Lutinus + transfer day 7

Trial contacts and locations

1

Loading...

Central trial contact

Anja B. Pinborg, Prof., DMSC; Marte Saupstad, MD

Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov

Clinical trials

Find clinical trialsTrials by location
© Copyright 2026 Veeva Systems