Status
Conditions
Treatments
About
Prone positioning has been shown to improve survival in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). However, a recent large observational study found that prone positioning was used in only 7% of all ARDS patients, and 16% in the severe category. However, this study did not focus on the prone position per se. In present study, the investigators would like to explore the rate of use of prone positioning in ARDS patients and the reasons why this treatment was not applied. The present study is one-day prevalence study repeated four times over one year.
The hypothesis is that the rate of use of prone position is greater than 50% in the severe ARDS category.
Enrollment
Sex
Ages
Volunteers
Inclusion criteria
1.ARDS criteria (Berlin definition) fulfilled the day of the study, whatever the ARDS stage. The onset of ARDS could have been established at any time between ICU admission and study day but ARDS criteria must be still present the day of the study. The ARDS criteria are listed below
2.PaO2/FIO2 ≤ 300 with PEEP ≥ 5 cmH2O
3.Age ≥ 18 years
4.Intubated or tracheotomized and mechanically ventilated
Exclusion criteria
736 participants in 1 patient group
Loading...
Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov
Clinical trials
Research sites
Resources
Legal