ClinicalTrials.Veeva

Menu

Prevention of Parastomal Hernia by Mesh Placement

University of Miami logo

University of Miami

Status

Terminated

Conditions

Parastomal Hernia

Treatments

Device: Ethicon Physiomesh

Study type

Interventional

Funder types

Other
Industry

Identifiers

NCT02404545
20140277

Details and patient eligibility

About

Concurrent placement of a mesh during formation of ileal conduit will decrease the incidence of parastomal hernia and associated complications.

Full description

Subject to inclusion and exclusion criteria, patients will be randomized 1:1 to the control and intervention groups:

Randomization groups:

  • Group 1 (control): Ileal Conduit
  • Group 2 (intervention): Ileal conduit with concurrent mesh placement.

Ethicon PHYSIOMESH composite mesh will be utilized for this study. This is a composite mesh with a reduced polypropylene content. It is a widely used, commercially available hernia mesh, and its use and placement are simple and well described. The mesh will be placed at the time of radical cystectomy and ileal conduit. A small circle of mesh, the diameter of the ileal conduit, will be excised to allow for fitment around the ileal conduit. The mesh will be placed so that it encompasses the ileal conduit in a non-constricting manner, and will be sutured to the anterior abdominal wall. Product will be stored in a secure, sterile manner at the UMH operating room sterile supply room, and in accordance with institutional policies.

Patients from both groups will be followed up in a standard fashion. Follow up visits and clinical assessment will be at 6 weeks after surgery, 3 monthly during the first year, then every 6 months for at least 5 years. During each visit, patients will be clinically evaluated for the presence or absence of parastomal hernia, and any routine surveillance radiology imaging will be reviewed.

Parastomal hernia is clinically defined as an incisional hernia at the site of the ileal conduit stoma. This may be clinically apparent by examining the patient during performance of abdominal straining or Valsalva maneuver, or may be evident on radiology imaging.

Enrollment

12 patients

Sex

All

Ages

18 to 80 years old

Volunteers

No Healthy Volunteers

Inclusion criteria

  1. Patients eligible to undergo urinary diversion with ileal conduit.
  2. Patients with the ability to understand and willingness to sign a written informed consent document.
  3. Men and Women aged 18 to 80 years.

Exclusion criteria

  1. Patients unable or unwilling to consent to the proposed surgery
  2. Pregnant women
  3. Patients with prior ileal conduit surgery undergoing revision.

Trial design

Primary purpose

Prevention

Allocation

Randomized

Interventional model

Parallel Assignment

Masking

None (Open label)

12 participants in 2 patient groups

Group 1 - Ideal Conduit No Mesh
No Intervention group
Description:
No mesh will be placed at the time of radical cystectomy and ileal conduit.
Group 2 - Ileal Conduit with Mesh
Active Comparator group
Description:
Ethicon Physiomesh will be placed at the time of radical cystectomy and ileal conduit.
Treatment:
Device: Ethicon Physiomesh

Trial contacts and locations

1

Loading...

Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov

Clinical trials

Find clinical trialsTrials by location
© Copyright 2026 Veeva Systems