Status
Conditions
Treatments
About
This randomized, double-blind, crossover clinical trial evaluated the effect of a probiotic-containing nanofiber dental floss on subgingival red complex periopathogens and gingival health in periodontally healthy individuals. Thirty male participants underwent two 14-day flossing interventions (probiotic floss and placebo floss), separated by a 14-day washout period. Clinical and microbiological parameters were assessed using standardized indices and multiplex qPCR.
This study was conducted prospectively but is being registered retrospectively to ensure transparency and compliance with NIH guidelines.
Full description
The study aimed to validate a targeted subgingival delivery method using Ligilactobacillus salivarius-infused nanofiber floss. Participants received both floss types in a crossover design. Clinical parameters (Approximal Plaque Index and Sulcus Bleeding Index) and microbiological markers (presence of L. salivarius, red complex pathogens, total bacterial DNA) were measured at multiple timepoints. DNA analysis was performed using validated multiplex qPCR protocols. Statistical analysis included non-parametric tests and correlation models. The study was ethically approved and conducted prospectively, but is being registered retrospectively to ensure transparency and support future publication.
Retrospective Registration Note:
This study was originally designed as a method validation investigation to refine subgingival probiotic delivery techniques using a newly developed nanofibre dental floss containing Ligilactobacillus salivarius. At the time of ethics approval and initiation (February 2022), the study was not classified as a clinical trial. However, subsequent interpretation of NIH guidelines suggests that the randomized, blinded, crossover design involving a health-related behavioral intervention meets criteria for interventional clinical research. Accordingly, the investigators now recognize that the study should be registered as a clinical trial. The research team is submitting this retrospective registration to ensure transparency and support future publication. No participant-level outcomes have been modified post hoc, and all data were collected prospectively under full ethical oversight.
Enrollment
Sex
Ages
Volunteers
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Primary purpose
Allocation
Interventional model
Masking
33 participants in 2 patient groups
Loading...
Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov
Clinical trials
Research sites
Resources
Legal