Process Validation in Dermatology: Assessing Methods for UV Exposure (Artificial Source vs. Sunlight) and Efficacy Evaluation of Anti-Tanning Agents

NovoBliss Research

Status: Completed

Conditions: Skin Pigmentation

Treatments: Other: Test Sun Protection Cream; Other: Benchmark Sun Protection Cream

Study type: Interventional

Funder types: Other

Identifiers

NCT06384092

NB240005-NB-V

Details and patient eligibility

About

The rationale of this study is to establish a robust method for assessing sun protection product efficacy in preventing erythema and tanning. Employing both artificial ultraviolet-A Irradiation and natural direct sunlight exposure, the investigation seeks to provide a reliable methodology, ensuring reproducibility and enabling a direct comparison between these methods. Meticulously determining optimal UV dosages, the study prioritizes inducing skin responses for evaluation while avoiding adverse effects like blistering. The localized validation of UV exposure techniques, tailored to the Indian population, contributes significantly to the field by addressing diverse skin types and environmental conditions. By incorporating both artificial and natural (direct sunlight) UV exposure methods, the study aspires to enhance the safety and effectiveness of future dermatological investigations, benefiting both the scientific community and the broader population.

Enrollment: 6 patients

Sex: All

Ages: 18 to 45 years old

Volunteers: Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Inclusion criteria

1. 06 Healthy adult subjects aged between 18 to 45 years (both inclusive).
2. Healthy adult male and non-pregnant|non-lactating females.
3. Female of childbearing potential have self-reported negative urine pregnancy test.
4. Subjects with Fitzpatrick skin types III to V will be included. Alternatively, subjects with a Skin colorimetric Individual Typology Angle (ITA) value ranging from 20° to 41° at the application site (forearms) to be included to ensure a diverse representation of skin tones.
5. Absence of known photosensitivity disorders to maintain the integrity of the study outcomes.
6. Subjects must exhibit a willingness to comply with study plan, including follow-up visits and product applications.
7. No history of skin cancer to or any adverse skin conditions, and not under any medication(s) likely to interfere with the study results.
8. Subjects willing to follow study direction and willing to give written informed consent for the participation.

Exclusion criteria

1. Active skin diseases, such as eczema or psoriasis, that could potentially influence skin reactions.
2. Use of photosensitizing medications that interfere with UV-induced skin responses.
3. Pregnancy or breastfeeding status, as hormonal changes during these periods can affect skin reactions.
4. Individuals with a history of severe adverse reactions to skincare or cosmetic products, ensuring participant safety.
5. Presence of open wounds, infections, or cuts at the application sites to prevent complications during the study.
6. Subjects with a history of significant sunburns in the past three months, minimizing the potential for confounding effects.

Trial design

Primary purpose: Health Services Research

Allocation: Non-Randomized

Interventional model: Parallel Assignment

Masking: None (Open label)

---

6 participants in 3 patient groups

Site T1

Experimental group

Description:

Test Product A - Test Sun Protection Cream Dosage Form - Cream Route of Administration - Topical Mode of Usage - Apply directly on the designated site till absorbed. Dosage - 0.2 mL/site

Treatment:

Other: Test Sun Protection Cream

Site T2

Active Comparator group

Description:

Test Product B - Benchmark (Sun Protection Cream) Dosage Form - Cream Route of Administration - Topical Mode of Usage - Apply directly on the designated site till absorbed. Dosage - 0.2 mL/site

Treatment:

Other: Benchmark Sun Protection Cream

Site U1-4

No Intervention group

Description:

Test Product : No test product applied.