Promoting Evidence-Based Decision-Making in India: District Evaluation Study on Health (DESH)

Unity Health Toronto

Status

Unknown

Conditions

Infectious Disease

Cardiovascular Disease

Treatments

Behavioral: District health information package

Study type

Interventional

Funder types

Other

Identifiers

NCT01003587

SMH 09-049

Details and patient eligibility

About

The purpose of this study is to assess the impact of disseminating information on comparative performance, along with actionable messages on how to improve health outcomes, to district-level decision-makers in India using a randomized, controlled design. This information should improve prioritization of health services by district health officers, budget allocation for health, and implementation of priority health services at the district level.

Full description

Use of evidence in policy is uneven, leading to frequent waste of resources. However, the best way to promote evidence uptake in policy formulation and implementation is unclear. Information on disease control priorities based on India's disease burden and health system capacity has been produced to help focus government efforts during a period of increased spending and decentralization.

This study tests the impact of sending information on comparative performance (using district report cards) and actionable messages (on how to reduce disease burden) to district-level decision-makers on uptake of disease control priority recommendations in India. Using a cluster-randomized design, districts will be randomized to receive either the mailed information package or no intervention. The sample includes all 594 Indian districts in existence in 2001. The intervention will target key district level decision-makers: parliamentarians (Members of Parliament, Members of Legislative Assembly), bureaucrats (District Collectors), technocrats (District Health Officers), and local government officials (Zilla Parishad CEOs).

Study outcome data will be collected using sequential national surveys of health service availability and utilization, including relevant rounds of the District Level Health and Facility Surveys and the Annual Health Surveys. This study tests an inexpensive, pragmatic strategy on a large scale and will provide information on effective methods of knowledge translation to policy-makers.

Enrollment

594 patients

Sex

All

Volunteers

No Healthy Volunteers

Inclusion and exclusion criteria

Inclusion Criteria (Districts):

All districts in India in existence in 2001

Exclusion Criteria (Districts):

All districts in India created after 2001

Inclusion Criteria (District Officials):

Members of Parliament (MPs) who sit in the Lok Sabha (Lower House of Parliament) and represent constituencies that are contained within or overlap study districts
Members of Legislative Assembly (MLAs) who represent constituencies that are contained within study districts
District Collectors (DCs) who administrate study districts
Zilla Parishad Chief Executive Officers (ZPCEOs) who administrate study districts
District Health Officers (DHOs) who work in study districts

Exclusion Criteria (District Officials):

MPs who sit in the Rajya Sabha (Upper House of Parliament), Lok Sabha MPs who represent constituencies not contained within or overlapping study districts, Lok Sabha MPs who represent constituencies that overlap both experimental and control study districts
MLAs who represent constituencies not contained within study districts
DCs who administrate non-study districts
ZPCEOs who administrate non-study districts
DHOs who work in non-study districts