Status
Conditions
Treatments
About
To Compare between outcomes of Antibiotic Prophylaxis and No antibiotic prophylaxis in non-complicated low risk laparoscopic cholecystectomy
Full description
There is no doubt that Laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) is the surgery of choice in cholelithiasis [1].
Routine antibiotic prophylaxis in LC decreases the rate of intra and post operative infections specifically the Surgical site infection (SSI) [2]. However, the rate of antibiotic side effects remains considerable, mainly antibiotic resistance to the commonly used antibiotics as Cefoperazone and other antibiotics used in routine prophylaxis [3]. So Some studies proved that No need for antibiotic prophylaxis [4]. In spite, no antibiotic prophylaxis may lead to infections mainly SSI and prolongation of hospitalization time [5]. However None of these studies has proved Superiority over the other and stills a matter of controversy [6]. For this reason more efforts are directed to limit the use of antibiotic in non complicated low risk laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Prophylaxis in this study is directed to start from time of admission till 1 month post operative. In our study we Follow both outcomes to compare between both techniques
Enrollment
Sex
Ages
Volunteers
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
200 participants in 2 patient groups
Loading...
Central trial contact
Ahmed H. Mohammed Ali, MD; Moursy M. Moursy, Prof
Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov
Clinical trials
Research sites
Resources
Legal