ClinicalTrials.Veeva

Menu

Propofol Spinal Procedural Sedation for Cesarean Section

M

Mansoura University

Status

Completed

Conditions

Patient Compliance

Treatments

Drug: propofol

Study type

Interventional

Funder types

Other

Identifiers

NCT03437980
R.18.02.23

Details and patient eligibility

About

Patient's safety and satisfaction are major concerns of anesthesiologists and obstetricians. According to evidence, guidelines and quality markers, regional anesthesia is preferred over general anesthesia in obstetric surgery. A high level of anxiety is present in obstetric patients preoperatively. Patients with high anxiety tend to prefer general anesthesia for cesarean section. The anxiety can be reduced variably by non-pharmacologic and pharmacologic methods. The evidence supports the benefits of procedural sedation for distressed, anxious pregnant women.

Full description

Propofol provides short onset, rapid predictable action, anxiolysis and amnesia and it is more effective than benzodiazepines. Using propofol infusion in low doses during spinal injection in CS did not adversely affect the Apgar scores or the neurological and adaptive fetal outcomes. The general consensus is that procedural sedation is not a routine for spinal interventions, but required for anxious patients. Our hypothesis is that, with the high prevalence of maternal anxiety during cesarean section, ensuring painless comfortable spinal anesthesia may increase the acceptance rate of regional anesthesia during cesarean section.

Enrollment

228 patients

Sex

Female

Ages

18 to 40 years old

Volunteers

No Healthy Volunteers

Inclusion criteria

  • Patients scheduled for elective cesarean section,
  • Age: 18 - 40 years,
  • American Society of Anesthesiologists I - III,
  • Patients may present any of the following conditions:
  • Respiratory diseases as bronchial asthma
  • Hepatic compromise,
  • Preeclampsia,
  • Anemia with hemoglobin 10 g/dl,
  • Previous sections,
  • Obese with BMI more than 35%,
  • Any criteria of difficult intubation, Compromised fetus as premature delivery, History of complications or non-satisfaction after general anesthesia during previous cesarean section,

Exclusion criteria

  • Patients refusing to participate in the study,
  • Known psychiatric disease,
  • Addiction medications,
  • Communication barrier,
  • Absolute or relative contraindication for spinal anesthesia,
  • Bad obstetric history, complicated pregnancy, congenital fetal anomaly.

Trial design

Primary purpose

Supportive Care

Allocation

N/A

Interventional model

Single Group Assignment

Masking

None (Open label)

228 participants in 1 patient group

propofol spinal acceptance
Experimental group
Description:
The surgeon and the anesthetist will discuss the exclusion criteria. Then they will discuss the information's about spinal and general anesthesia with the illegible patients, also reply the patient's questions in a preoperative visit. The primary decision for the patient; either spinal or general anesthesia will be recorded. The patients refusing spinal anesthesia will be discussed again to detect the rate of acceptance of spinal anesthesia if propofol sedation is ensured during the procedure to provide a painless spinal injection. The final decision will be applied; either spinal with procedural sedation, or general anesthesia.
Treatment:
Drug: propofol

Trial contacts and locations

3

Loading...

Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov

Clinical trials

Find clinical trialsTrials by location
© Copyright 2025 Veeva Systems