Status
Conditions
Treatments
About
Arteriovenous fistula or graft are the ideal hemodialysis access. Nonetheless the most common access type used for Continuous Renal Replacement Therapy (CRRT) is either a temporary or permanent hemodialysis catheter. Recommendations for the use of catheters to deliver CRRT in end stage kidney disease (ESKD) patients are lacking on data and subjective to anecdotal experiences and expert consensus. The repetitive placement of catheters in ESKD patients have shown to increase the chances of central vascular stenosis which is one of the main risk factors that lead to access failure. Also, the repetitive use of dialysis catheters increases the risk for catheter associated infections. Dedicated studies demonstrating the safety and feasibility of using arteriovenous access (AVA) for CRRT are scarce. No screening criteria or algorithm exists to determine the adequate patient and clinical scenario to use AVA for CRRT.
Goals of the study:
Full description
This study is a single-center, single-arm, quasi-experimental implementation study incorporating both retrospective and prospective data collection to evaluate the feasibility, safety, and clinical outcomes of using existing arteriovenous access (AVA)-including arteriovenous fistulas (AVFs) and arteriovenous grafts (AVGs)-for delivery of continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) in critically ill patients.
A. Background and Rationale:The current standard of care for CRRT delivery in the intensive care unit (ICU) is the placement of a temporary dialysis catheter (TDC). While effective, temporary catheter placement is associated with known risks, including catheter-related bloodstream infections, mechanical complications (e.g., pneumothorax, arterial puncture), thrombosis, bleeding, and delays in therapy due to procedural or operator-related factors. These risks may be particularly relevant in patients with end-stage kidney disease (ESKD) who are admitted to the ICU and already possess a mature, functioning AVF or AVG.
Despite the availability of established vascular access in these patients, temporary dialysis catheters are frequently inserted due to concerns regarding vascular safety, needle dislodgement, bleeding risk, access thrombosis in hypotensive states, and limited ICU staff familiarity with AVA cannulation and monitoring. According to the Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) Acute Kidney Injury guidelines, the recommendation to use a temporary dialysis catheter for CRRT initiation is supported by low-quality evidence (Grade 2D), highlighting the need for further investigation into alternative access strategies.
Retrospective observational studies conducted in the United States, including the "Michigan Experience," have suggested that CRRT delivery via AVA may be safe and feasible when appropriate protocols, interdisciplinary coordination, and patient selection criteria are applied. However, prospective implementation data remain limited.
B. Study Objectives The primary objective of this study is to prospectively evaluate the safety and feasibility of delivering CRRT via pre-existing AVA (AVF or AVG) in ICU patients.
Secondary objectives include:
C. Study Design: This is a single-arm, single-center, quasi-experimental implementation study consisting of:
A single-arm design was selected to allow focused safety surveillance and protocol optimization without confounding from comparator access modalities. Outcomes will be compared descriptively to historical institutional data for CRRT delivered via temporary dialysis catheters.
D. Patient Selection and Eligibility Considerations:
Patients eligible for inclusion will be critically ill adults requiring CRRT who have a mature, functional AVF or AVG. Careful patient selection is essential to minimize risk. Key clinical considerations include:
Final determination of candidacy will be made by the treating nephrologist in collaboration with the ICU team.
E. Safety Considerations and Monitoring:
Recognized risks of AVA-based CRRT include:
To mitigate these risks, a detailed SOP will be implemented, including:
Dialysis nurses will be responsible for AVA cannulation, needle adjustment, and removal. ICU nurses will manage the CRRT machine and perform continuous monitoring of the vascular access site, with predefined criteria for urgent nephrology notification. Nephrologists will oversee patient selection, duration of AVA use, and overall renal replacement therapy management.
F. Implementation and Interdisciplinary Collaboration:
A central component of this study is the development and iterative refinement of a standardized operating procedure (SOP) to safely integrate AVA-based CRRT into ICU practice. The prospective design allows for real-time safety surveillance, early identification of protocol deviations or unforeseen complications, and structured protocol refinement.
This study represents the first prospective implementation of AVA use for CRRT at this institution and aims to contribute meaningful prospective data to a limited but evolving body of literature. Findings may inform best practices, reduce unnecessary temporary catheter placement, and improve vascular access preservation in patients with ESKD requiring critical care.
Enrollment
Sex
Ages
Volunteers
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
50 participants in 1 patient group
Loading...
Central trial contact
Iskra Myers, MD; Armando Rodriguez Lopez, MD
Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov
Clinical trials
Research sites
Resources
Legal