ClinicalTrials.Veeva

Menu

Prospective Randomized Evaluation of Decompressive Ipsilateral Craniectomy for Traumatic Acute Epidural Hematoma (PREDICT-AEDH)

Shanghai Jiao Tong University logo

Shanghai Jiao Tong University

Status

Active, not recruiting

Conditions

Craniotomy
Epidural Hematoma
Brain Herniation
Decompressive Craniectomy

Treatments

Procedure: Craniotomy
Procedure: Decompressive Craniectomy

Study type

Interventional

Funder types

Other

Identifiers

NCT04261673
PREDICT-AEDH

Details and patient eligibility

About

Although craniotomy provides a more complete evacuation of the acute epidural hematoma, there are insufficient data to support specific surgical treatment method. We aim to perform a multi-center, parallel-group randomized clinical trial to compare the outcome and cost-effectiveness of decompressive craniectomy versus craniotomy for the treatment of traumatic brain injury patients with cerebral herniation undergoing evacuation of an acute epidural hematoma.

Full description

The incidence of epidural hematoma (EDH) among traumatic brain injury (TBI) patients has been reported to be in the range of 2.7 to 4%. Among patients in coma, up to 9% harbored an EDH requiring craniotomy. The mortality in patients in all age groups and GCS scores undergoing surgery for evacuation of EDH is approximately 10%. The decision to operate on an acute EDH (AEDH) is usually based on the patient's GCS score, age, pupillary abnormalities, comorbidities, CT findings, associated intracranial lesions, in delayed decisions, the time between neurological deterioration and surgery, and intracranial pressure. An AEDH greater than 30 ml should be surgically evacuated regardless of the patient's Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) score. There are insufficient data to support one surgical treatment method. However, craniotomy provides a more complete evacuation of the hematoma for patients with an AEDH that require an operation to remove the clot. But whether decompressive craniectomy (DC) should be employed still has considerable controversy. The choice of operative technique is influenced by the surgeon's expertise, training, and evaluation of a particular situation. The difference between these two procedures is that a bone flap is left out before closing the skin in DC. Both approaches are widely used among neurological surgeons (although the indications may differ), therefore there is sufficient experience in the centers to set up a randomized clinical trial.

Enrollment

120 estimated patients

Sex

All

Ages

18 to 65 years old

Volunteers

No Healthy Volunteers

Inclusion criteria

  1. Clear medical history of traumatic brain injury;
  2. Within 12 hours after injury;
  3. Unilateral mydriasis or bilateral mydriasis before the operation;
  4. Acute supratentorial epidural hematoma and signs of brain stem compression on CT scan, representing the leading cause of operation, despite any other minor intracranial injuries associated (e.g., subarachnoid hemorrhage and contusion);
  5. The admitting neurosurgeon considers that the epidural hematoma needs to be evacuated with a craniotomy or decompressive craniectomy.
  6. With informed consent.

Exclusion criteria

  1. Previous intracranial surgery prior to trauma;
  2. Patients with a score of 3 on the GCS, with bilateral fixed and dilated pupils, bleeding diathesis or defective coagulation, or other injuries that were deemed to be unsurvivable;
  3. Patients who had injury of the oculomotor nerve;
  4. Patients are considered to be operated mainly by following pathological change on CT: subdural hematoma, intracerebral hemorrhage, large size infarction, et al., but not because of epidural hematoma;
  5. Severe pre-existing disability or severe co-morbidity which would lead to a poor outcome even if the patient is supposed to a good recovery from the TBI;
  6. Pregnant female.

Trial design

Primary purpose

Treatment

Allocation

Randomized

Interventional model

Parallel Assignment

Masking

None (Open label)

120 participants in 2 patient groups

Decompressive Craniectomy
Experimental group
Description:
After the evacuation of epidural hematoma, the bone flap should not be replaced at the end of the operation.
Treatment:
Procedure: Decompressive Craniectomy
Craniotomy
Experimental group
Description:
After the evacuation of epidural hematoma, the bone flap must be replaced and fixed with an appropriate fixation system.
Treatment:
Procedure: Craniotomy

Trial contacts and locations

1

Loading...

Central trial contact

Junfeng Feng, MD

Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov

Clinical trials

Find clinical trialsTrials by location
© Copyright 2026 Veeva Systems