Status and phase
Conditions
Treatments
About
The purpose of this study is to determine if celiac bloc (with injection of steroid and local anesthetic) is superior to a sham procedure for pain control and quality of life improvement in patient with chronic pancreatitis and abdominal pain.
Full description
Chronic pancreatitis is a condition that can lead to very disabling pain symptoms that are difficult to control. The use of morphine is often necessary and also induces a series of secondary symptoms.
In this context, the injection into the celiac plexus block of a local anesthetic has often been proposed as an alternative. This procedure, by interrupting the afferent pain signal of pancreatic origin, aims to reduce pain and improve quality of life at the cost of fewer side effects.
This procedure can be performed transcutaneously using the anatomical landmark or under radiological control. It can also be performed via endosonography (EUS) with better control of the injection site under ultrasound control.
The results of the literature concerning the efficacy of the celiac block in chronic pancreatitis are rather encouraging with reported figures of partial or complete pain control in 39 to 65% of patients [1-7].
However, the number of prospective studies concerning this technique performed endoscopically remains low to date. In particular, there are no case control studies. Data is also poor on the impact on quality of life.
The study proposed here will therefore attempt to provide answers to the questions still pending: is the block by EUS superior to a diagnostic EUS without treatment? ; how long does this treatment last? ; does it have an impact on the quality of life of patients? This study and its draft are inspired by a similar recent study conducted in our department on patients with pancreatic neoplasia. The results of the latter are being submitted for publication.
Enrollment
Sex
Ages
Volunteers
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Primary purpose
Allocation
Interventional model
Masking
2 participants in 2 patient groups
Loading...
Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov
Clinical trials
Research sites
Resources
Legal