ClinicalTrials.Veeva

Menu

Prosthetic Motility and Complications in Pegged Versus Unpegged Hydroxyapatite Orbital Implants

S

Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences

Status and phase

Unknown
Phase 3
Phase 2

Conditions

Orbital Implants
Anophthalmos

Treatments

Procedure: orbital implant

Study type

Interventional

Funder types

Other

Identifiers

Details and patient eligibility

About

Pegging the hydroxyapatite for increasing prosthetic motility sometimes leads to some complications for the patient. These complications ranging from discharge, granuloma formation, exposure, implant infection to socket discomfort and etc. We are going to compare prosthetic motility, objectively and subjectively (patients satisfaction) before and after pegging the hydroxy- apatite, and evaluate the complications after pegging.

Enrollment

50 estimated patients

Sex

All

Volunteers

No Healthy Volunteers

Inclusion criteria

  • orbital hydroxyapatite implants

Exclusion criteria

  • history of systemic disease
  • history of radio therapy
  • secondary hydroxapatite implant
  • complications lead to re-surgery

Trial design

Primary purpose

Treatment

Allocation

Non-Randomized

Interventional model

Single Group Assignment

Masking

None (Open label)

50 participants in 2 patient groups

1
Active Comparator group
Description:
Pegged unpegged hydroxyapatite orbital implantation
Treatment:
Procedure: orbital implant
2
Active Comparator group
Description:
Unpegged hydroxyapatite orbital implantation
Treatment:
Procedure: orbital implant

Trial contacts and locations

1

Loading...

Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov

Clinical trials

Find clinical trialsTrials by location
© Copyright 2026 Veeva Systems