ClinicalTrials.Veeva

Menu

Protective Effects of Remote Limb Ischemic Preconditioning on Acute Cerebral Infarction

C

Capital Medical University

Status and phase

Unknown
Phase 2
Phase 1

Conditions

Stroke

Treatments

Device: Control group
Device: RIPC group

Study type

Interventional

Funder types

Other

Identifiers

NCT01672515
2012-RIPC-cerebral infarction

Details and patient eligibility

About

Stroke is one of the three leading causes of human death, and a major cause of adult disability. Our pre-clinical studies confirmed that ischemic preconditioning can prevent cerebral infarction. Animal studies confirmed that ischemic postconditioning can reduce infarct size of cerebral infarction. Investigators hypothesized that postconditioning would reduce infarct volume of ischemic stroke patients.

Full description

This study explored the neuroprotective effects of post-positioning on ischemic stroke patients with randomized, double-blinded and controlled method. Patients are divided into experimental and placebo groups to receive remote ischemic post-conditioning for 30 days. Remote ischemic post-conditioning is performed by the inflating tourniquets to certain extents on bilateral arms with 5 cycles of 5min inflation and 5min relax alternation for the total of 30 consecutive days. It is 200mmHg for RIPC group and 60mmHg for control group. Evaluation parameters include CRP, TNF-α, ICAM-1 and GFAP in blood at 0, 3, 7, 15 and 30 days after treatment; and MRI at 0 and 30 days after treatment.

Enrollment

80 estimated patients

Sex

All

Ages

40 to 80 years old

Volunteers

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Inclusion criteria

  1. age between 40 to 80 Years
  2. Ischemic cerebrovascular disease within 6 hours
  3. National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale(NIHSS) score 0-15,and Modified Rankin Scale(mRS) score 0-4
  4. Cranial CT to rule out the the cerebral hemorrhage
  5. Written informed consent was

Exclusion criteria

  1. Cerebral hemorrhage
  2. Other parts of the active bleeding disease
  3. Atrial fibrillation
  4. Moyamoya disease or vasculitis
  5. Hereditary disease, such as with CADASIL, FABRY, mitochondrial myopathy
  6. Out coagulation disorder
  7. Severe lesions of severe liver and kidney disease, malignancy or other systemic
  8. Cannot tolerate BLIPC or without informed consent

Trial design

Primary purpose

Treatment

Allocation

Randomized

Interventional model

Parallel Assignment

Masking

Double Blind

80 participants in 2 patient groups

RIPC group
Experimental group
Description:
RIPC treatment was performed by the inflating tourniquets to 200mmHg on bilateral arms with 5 cycles of 5min inflation and 5min relax alternation for the total of 30 consecutive days.
Treatment:
Device: RIPC group
Control group
Sham Comparator group
Description:
RIPC sham was performed by the inflating tourniquets to 60mmHg on bilateral arms with 5 cycles of 5min inflation and 5min relax alternation for the total of 30 consecutive days.
Treatment:
Device: Control group

Trial contacts and locations

0

Loading...

Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov

Clinical trials

Find clinical trialsTrials by location
© Copyright 2026 Veeva Systems