Pull-out Tenolysis Versus Simple A1 Pulley Release in Trigger Digits

Eleni Karagergou

Status: Not yet enrolling

Conditions: Trigger Digit

Treatments: Procedure: A1 pulley release and pull out tenolysis; Procedure: Simple A1 pulley release

Study type: Interventional

Funder types: Other

Identifiers

NCT06747962

1543/ 18.11.2024

Details and patient eligibility

About

Trigger finger is a common tendinopathy and clinically presents with painful catching or popping as the patient flexes and extends the digit, due to mechanical impingement of the thickened flexor tendons as they pass through a narrow tendon sheath canal at the level of the metacarpal head. If conservative management with corticosteroid injection and splinting fails or if symptoms recur, surgery and division of the A1 pulley are indicated. Traction (or pull- out) tenolysis is a maneuver based on pulling of the flexor tendons out of the wound, to release any adhesions that might have occurred due to long- standing triggering. Although it has been associated with postoperative pain and stiffness, no robust evidence exists to support its benefit or not. In view of the low quality evidence regarding the pros and cons of traction (or pull-out) tenolysis following A1 pulley release, the investigators will compare simple A1 pulley release versus A1 pulley release and pull-out tenolysis in a prospective randomized study design. Hypothesis of the study is that the pull- out tenolysis yields better results in terms of total active range of movement, pinch and grip strength, pain and quick-DASH scoring when compared to simple pulley release. The confirmation of the hypothesis will justify the use of pull-out tenolysis as a means of breaking any tendon adhesions and returning to normal function sooner. On the contrary, if the pull-out tenolysis is linked to a less favorable functional outcome, simple A1 pulley release will be recommended.

Full description

Trigger finger is a common condition that can cause hand pain and disability. It involves entrapment of the flexor tendons of the fingers and thumb within their flexor tendon sheath at the level of the metacarpal head. This phenomenon is due to the mechanical impingement of the thickened flexor tendons as they pass through a narrow tendon sheath canal. It can cause painful catching or popping as the patient flexes and extends the digit. On occasion, the digit will lock in flexion and require passive manipulation to extend. Initial management can be conservative with corticosteroid injection and splinting. If conservative management fails or if symptoms recur, surgical release of the A1 pulley is indicated. This is a common procedure which is performed under local anaesthesia. Intraoperatively, following division of A1 pulley, a traction tenolysis is occasionally performed by some surgeons. This maneuver, which is based on pulling of the flexor tendons out of the wound, is believed to release any adhesions that might have occurred due to long- standing triggering but it has been reported to result in prolonged postoperative pain and stiffness. However, there is no robust evidence to support a less favorable outcome following traction tenolysis. Aim of the study: In view of the low quality evidence regarding the pros and cons of traction (or pull-out) tenolysis following A1 pulley release, the investigators will compare simple A1 pulley release versus A1 pulley release and pull-out tenolysis in a prospective randomized study design. Hypothesis of the study is that the pull-out tenolysis yields better results in terms of total active range of movement, pinch and grip strength, pain and quick-DASH scoring when compared to simple pulley release. The confirmation of the hypothesis will justify the use of pull-out tenolysis as a means of breaking any tendon adhesions and returning to normal function sooner. On the contrary, if the pull- out tenolysis is linked to a less favorable functional outcome, simple A1 pulley release will be recommended. The study will be conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki and the Guidelines on Good Clinical Practice.

Enrollment: 40 estimated patients

Sex: All

Ages: 18 to 100 years old

Volunteers: No Healthy Volunteers

Inclusion criteria

• Patients with single trigger finger that failed conservative treatment
• Patients with single trigger finger that had recurrence of symptoms after conservative treatment

Exclusion criteria

• Patients with limited range of movement before appearance of triggering
• Patients with osteoarthritis / rheumatoid arthritis
• Patients that had a second procedure at the same time of trigger finger release (eg carpal tunnel release).

Trial design

Primary purpose: Treatment

Allocation: Randomized

Interventional model: Parallel Assignment

Masking: Double Blind

---

40 participants in 2 patient groups, including a placebo group

Pull out tenolysis group

Active Comparator group

Description:

A1 pulley release and pull out tenolysis for the treatment of trigger fingers and thumb

Treatment:

Procedure: A1 pulley release and pull out tenolysis

Simple A1 pulley release group

Placebo Comparator group

Description:

Simple A1 pulley release for the treatment of trigger fingers and thumb

Treatment:

Procedure: Simple A1 pulley release