Status
Conditions
Treatments
About
Current evidence suggests that noninvasive positive pressure ventilation (NIPPV) is more effective than continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) in preventing respiratory failure in preterm infants with respiratory distress syndrome (RDS), both as initial and post-extubation support. NIPPV may be delivered in synchronized (sNIPPV) or non-synchronized (nsNIPPV) modes, with sNIPPV offering clear benefits by coordinating support with the infant's own breathing. Recent studies indicate sNIPPV is superior to nsNIPPV in preventing respiratory failure, though the intrapulmonary mechanisms behind this advantage remain unclear. To address this, the present study uses Electrical Impedance Tomography (EIT) to evaluate how lung volume changes during different types of breaths and ventilator inflations - spontaneous breaths, synchronized inflations, non-synchronized inflations, and backup inflations - in preterm infants receiving sNIPPV.
Full description
Hypothesis:
Synchronized inflations during NIPPV will increase tidal volumes (VT) and lung aeration when compared with non-synchronized inflations. Pressure peaks delivered during expiration (non-synchronized inflations), between spontaneous breaths (backup inflations), or during periods of apnea (backup inflations) will not increase relative VT.
Primary objective:
The primary objective is to assess lung volume changes between spontaneous breaths and synchronized inflations, non-synchronized inflations, and backup inflations using EIT.
Secondary objectives:
The secondary objectives are to assess regional differences in aeration and ventilation among spontaneous breaths, synchronized inflations, non-synchronized inflations, and backup inflations using EIT.
Primary endpoint:
Difference in relative Vt (rel. Delta-Z) between spontaneous breaths and synchronized inflations.
Study procedures:
Study procedures include attaching an EIT belt and a pulse oximeter sensor during the final nursing care session before the study begins. Synchronized NIPPV is provided by EVEneo ventilators, and synchronization will be achieved through an abdominal capsule (Graseby).
Enrollment
Sex
Ages
Volunteers
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
27 participants in 1 patient group
Loading...
Central trial contact
Christoph M Rüegger, MD; Claudia Knöpfli
Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov
Clinical trials
Research sites
Resources
Legal