Status
Conditions
Treatments
About
Individuals who suffer from a stroke, cardiac arrest, or traumatic bleeding (hemorrhage) injuries often have compromised blood flow and oxygen to the brain which can lead to the death of brain cells, and if the patient survives, subsequent difficulty in thinking and performing tasks of daily living. Traditionally, delivery of a constant flow of blood to the brain has been thought to be the most important factor for the survival of brain cells. In this study, a novel intervention will be assessed called "pulsatile perfusion therapy", delivering blood flow in a slow pulsing pattern. It is anticipated this intervention will improve brain blood flow and oxygenation during these serious clinical events.
There is a specific interest in whether delivery of brain blood flow with a slow pulsatile pattern will improve oxygenation of brain tissue, particularly when the brain is challenged under low oxygen (hypoxia) and low volume (hypovolemia) conditions, simulating stroke, cardiac arrest, and hemorrhage. A technique called oscillatory lower body negative pressure (OLBNP) will be used in healthy human participants, facilitating delivery of blood flow to the brain with different pulsing patterns. This technique will allow for determination of the ideal pattern of brain blood flow that improves oxygenation of the brain tissue. Measurements will be made of substances in the blood that may be released with pulsatile flow which act on the blood vessels to increase flow and delivery of oxygen.
Full description
Hemorrhage due to trauma is one of the leading causes of morbidity and mortality worldwide in both the civilian and military settings. A major factor contributing to death and disability from severe blood loss is poor tissue perfusion and oxygenation of the vital organs. Traditionally, protection of absolute cerebral blood flow (CBF) has been deemed the most important factor in maintaining perfusion and oxygenation. In recent years, it has been shown that low frequency (LF, ~0.1 Hz) pulsatile CBF is associated with increased tolerance to simulated hemorrhage in healthy human subjects, despite ≥30% reductions in absolute CBF. The underlying mechanism for this improvement in tolerance is unclear; the proposed study aims to address this knowledge gap. The central hypothesis is that LF oscillations (~0.1 Hz) will improve CBF and tissue oxygenation under hypoxic and/or hypovolemic conditions, due to increased shear stress and the release of vasoactive mediators that facilitate vasodilation and enhanced tissue perfusion. This hypothesis will be addressed in two Specific Aims under hypoxic and hypovolemic conditions: 1) determine if inducing oscillations in arterial blood pressure and CBF at 0.1 Hz elicits shear stress-induced vasodilation, subsequently increasing CBF and oxygenation; and, 2) assess the effect of 0.1 Hz oscillations on the release of shear stress-induced vasoactive mediators. Twenty human subjects (males and females) will be recruited to address these aims using oscillatory lower body negative pressure (OLBNP) to induce 0.1 Hz oscillations. Measurements will include CBF (intracranial & extracranial arteries), shear stress, cerebral oxygenation, arterial pressure, and venous blood samples for assessment of nitric oxide, prostaglandin E2, 6-keto-PGF1α (a metabolite of prostacyclin, PGI2), histamine, and endothelin-1. The rationale for the proposed research is to identify a mechanism for the previously observed increase in tolerance to simulated hemorrhage with increases in LF oscillations in arterial pressure and CBF. The approach is innovative as it challenges the traditional association of hemodynamic variability with negative clinical outcomes using a novel methodological approach in human subjects. This contribution is significant as the findings may provide an alternative approach to maintaining cerebral perfusion and oxygenation under conditions of hypovolemia and/or hypoxia.
Enrollment
Sex
Ages
Volunteers
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Primary purpose
Allocation
Interventional model
Masking
21 participants in 1 patient group
Loading...
Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov
Clinical trials
Research sites
Resources
Legal