ClinicalTrials.Veeva

Menu

Pulsed Electromagnetic Field Therapy for Neuropathic Pain in Lumbar Disc Herniation

H

Haydarpasa Numune Training and Research Hospital

Status

Completed

Conditions

Lumbar Disc Herniation With Radiculopathy

Treatments

Device: Sham PEMF
Device: Pulsed electromagnetic field (PEMF)

Study type

Interventional

Funder types

Other

Identifiers

NCT07263737
HNEAH-KAEK 2022/KK/124

Details and patient eligibility

About

This randomized controlled study evaluated whether adding pulsed electromagnetic field (PEMF) therapy to conventional physical therapy provides additional benefits for neuropathic pain and disability in patients with lumbar disc herniation (LDH).

→ This study randomly assigned patients into groups to compare treatments. It examined whether adding pulsed electromagnetic field (PEMF) therapy to standard physical therapy could give extra improvement in nerve-related pain and daily function in people with a slipped disc in the lower back.

Fifty-two patients with ≥3 months of radicular and neuropathic symptoms were enrolled and randomly assigned to a treatment group (PEMF + conventional therapy) or a control group (sham PEMF + conventional therapy).

→ Fifty-two patients who had leg pain and nerve-related symptoms for at least three months joined the study. They were randomly placed into either a treatment group (which received PEMF plus regular therapy) or a control group (which received a fake PEMF treatment plus regular therapy).

Both groups received transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation, hot packs, and a lumbar exercise program for 15 sessions.

→ Both groups also received the same standard treatments: electrical nerve stimulation, hot packs, and a lower-back exercise program for 15 sessions.

Clinical outcomes-including Visual Analog Scale (VAS), pressure pain threshold, Modified Schober test, DN4, PainDetect, Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), and SF-36-were assessed at baseline, post-treatment, and one month after treatment.

→ Several health measures were checked before treatment, right after treatment, and again one month later. These included pain level (VAS), how sensitive the area was to pressure, lower-back flexibility, nerve-pain questionnaires (DN4 and PainDetect), disability level (ODI), and overall quality of life (SF-36).

Forty-six patients completed the study. → A total of 46 patients finished the study.

Both groups showed significant improvements in VAS scores, neuropathic pain questionnaires (DN4, PainDetect), ODI, and several SF-36 subscales (physical functioning, role-physical, and pain), with additional improvements in emotional role and social functioning observed only in the PEMF group.

→ Both groups improved in many areas: pain levels, nerve-pain scores, disability, and some parts of quality of life (such as physical functioning, daily roles, and pain). Only the PEMF group showed extra improvement in emotional well-being and social activities.

However, none of the between-group comparisons demonstrated significant differences.

  • However, when the two groups were compared to each other, there were no meaningful differences.

No meaningful changes were found in lumbar flexibility or pressure pain thresholds in either group.

→ Neither group showed important changes in lower-back flexibility or in how much pressure they could tolerate on painful areas.

In conclusion, adding PEMF therapy to conventional physical therapy did not provide additional benefit for neuropathic symptoms, radicular pain, disability, lumbar flexibility, pressure pain threshold, or quality of life in patients with LDH-related neuropathic pain.

→ In summary, adding PEMF therapy to regular physical therapy did not give extra benefits for nerve pain, leg pain, disability, back flexibility, sensitivity to pressure, or quality of life in people with nerve-related pain caused by a slipped disc.

Enrollment

46 patients

Sex

All

Ages

18 to 75 years old

Volunteers

No Healthy Volunteers

Inclusion criteria

  • • Radicular pain and neuropathic symptoms lasting longer than 3 months

    • Presence of lumbar disc herniation on lumbar MRI
    • Age between 18 and 75 years
    • Visual Analog Scale (VAS) ≥ 4
    • DN4 ≥ 4
    • At least one positive test among Straight Leg Raise Test (SLRT) and femoral stretch test
    • Patients without cognitive impairment who are able to follow verbal instructions

Exclusion criteria

-• Having undergone an interventional lumbar injection within the last 3 months

  • Receiving physical therapy within the last 3 months
  • Using medical treatment for neuropathic pain within the last 3 months
  • History of lumbar surgery
  • Presence of another neurological disorder that could cause neuropathic symptoms
  • Cauda equina syndrome
  • History of malignancy
  • Uncontrolled cardiopulmonary disease
  • Pregnancy
  • Presence of a pacemaker or electronic implant
  • Presence of diabetic neuropathy

Trial design

Primary purpose

Treatment

Allocation

Randomized

Interventional model

Parallel Assignment

Masking

Quadruple Blind

46 participants in 2 patient groups

Pulsed electromagnetic field (PEMF) and physical therapy
Experimental group
Description:
The physical therapy protocol was arranged as follows: 20 minutes of hot pack application to the lumbar region, 10 minutes of rest, 20 minutes of conventional transcutaneus electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) applied to the lumbar region and along the radicular pain pathway, followed by another 10 minutes of rest, and finally 30 minutes of magnetic field therapy . One session lasted a total of 90 minutes. On the first day, patients were thoroughly instructed in a home exercise program that included lumbar isometric strengthening, pelvic tilt exercises, hamstring stretching, and core stabilization exercises. They were asked to perform each exercise twice daily with ten repetitions throughout the physical therapy program. Patients received one session per day, five days per week, for a total of 15 sessions.
Treatment:
Device: Pulsed electromagnetic field (PEMF)
Sham Pulsed electromagnetic field (PEMF) and physical therapy
Sham Comparator group
Description:
The physical therapy protocol was arranged as follows: 20 minutes of hot pack application to the lumbar region, 10 minutes of rest, 20 minutes of conventional transcutaneus electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) applied to the lumbar region and along the radicular pain pathway, followed by another 10 minutes of rest, and finally 30 minutes of sham magnetic field therapy . One session lasted a total of 90 minutes. On the first day, patients were thoroughly instructed in a home exercise program that included lumbar isometric strengthening, pelvic tilt exercises, hamstring stretching, and core stabilization exercises. They were asked to perform each exercise twice daily with ten repetitions throughout the physical therapy program. Patients received one session per day, five days per week, for a total of 15 sessions.
Treatment:
Device: Sham PEMF

Trial contacts and locations

1

Loading...

Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov

Clinical trials

Find clinical trialsTrials by location
© Copyright 2026 Veeva Systems