Pulsed Field Ablation Versus Conventional Radiofrequency Catheter Ablation for Repeat PVI in Patients With Paroxysmal AF (REPEAT-AF)

University Medical Center Groningen (UMCG)

Status: Not yet enrolling

Conditions: Atrial Fibrillation Recurrent

Treatments: Device: pulmonary vein isolation with PFA; Device: pulmonary vein isolation with RFA

Study type: Interventional

Funder types: Other; Industry

Identifiers

NCT06199180

REPEAT-AF trial

Details and patient eligibility

About

Various methods exist for performing pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF), including thermal ablation and pulse-field ablation (PFA). However, in cases requiring a second PVI for recurrent AF, radiofrequency ablation (RFA) is utilized in nearly 95% of instances post-acquiring a 3D high-density map from the left atrium (LA). Up to 85% of patients experiencing recurrent AF after the initial PVI exhibit pulmonary vein (PV) reconnections, often identified as the cause of AF.

PFA has demonstrated its safety and efficiency compared to RFA as a swift technique for performing ablation. Yet, whether PFA or RFA stands out as superior or safer when applied for a second PVI remains unclear, as no randomized controlled trial has investigated this comparison. The proposed REPEAT-AF trial aims to randomize 154 AF patients experiencing recurrent AF after the initial PVI, assigning them in a 1:1 ratio to either RFA or PFA. Each patient will receive an implantable cardiac monitor to precisely detect any AF recurrences.

Full description

This study involves assessing suitable patients through (a) review of the patient's medical/surgical history, (b) assessment of concomitant medications, (c) documentation of AF recurrence ≥30 seconds, (d) transthoracic echocardiogram (≤6 months prior), and (e) an evaluation by the treating cardiac electrophysiologist to confirm eligibility for repeat PVI. Qualified screened patients are eligible for study enrolment.

All participating patients are required to provide written (or equivalent) informed consent, indicated by a dated signature of the subject or legal representative. The consent process must comply with applicable national regulations and use language understandable by the patient.

The study will be conducted at 6 clinical centres/investigational sites across the Netherlands. Patients will be randomized (1:1) into a PFA or point-by-point RF ablation arm. Randomization will occur prior to the ablation procedure. A implantable cardiac monitor will be implanted in all randomised patients one month before ablation to accurately monitor any AF/atrial flutter (AFL)/ atrial tachycardia (AT) recurrence. Treatment allocation will be processed through the Dutch 'National Heart Registry' (NHR) data platform.

Patients randomized to both arms of the study will be evaluated for PV isolation at the start of the ablation procedure. If PV reconnection is identified in patients in the point-by-point RF arm, re-ablation will occur according to the study protocol. Patients in the PFA arm will have PV reconnection determined using the FARAWAVE catheter. Those with no PV reconnection (100% PV isolation/durable PVI) will be followed in an observational registry.

The PFA ablation arm involves the use of the Farastar generator system, Farawave ablation catheter, and Faradrive steering catheter for the procedure. The RF point-by-point ablation arm (control) involves RF ablation following standard practice.

Patients will be closely monitored during the study for any adverse effects or procedure-related complications.

Enrollment: 154 estimated patients

Sex: All

Ages: 18 to 80 years old

Volunteers: No Healthy Volunteers

Inclusion and exclusion criteria

Subjects who meet all of the following inclusion criteria at screening will be eligible for enrolment:

• Patient had 1 previous PVI with either cryoballoon or RF ablation
• Index PVI occurred within <5 years prior to enrolment
• Documented AF recurrence >30 seconds
• Symptomatic AF
• Paroxysmal AF
• Age >18 and <80 years
• Willing and capable to provide informed consent
• Able and willing to participate in all examinations and follow-up visits and tests associated with this clinical study

Subjects who meet ANY of the following exclusion criteria will be excluded from the study:

• Persistent AF (by diagnosis of duration >7 days)

• Index AF ablation performed with PFA

• Concomitant/ prior diagnosis for atrial tachycardia (AT) and/or atrial flutter (AFl). Note typical cavotricuspid isthmus dependent flutter is not an exclusion criterium.

• Underwent additional ablations outside the pulmonary veins during index AF ablation

• AF secondary to electrolyte imbalance, thyroid disease, alcohol abuse, or other reversible/non-cardiac causes

• Contraindication to, or unwillingness to use, systematic anticoagulation

• Left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) <30% as documented by transthoracic echo (TTE) (within <3 months prior)

• Left atrial volume index >60 ml/m2

• Clinically significant arrhythmias other than AF

• Previous surgery for AF

• New York Heart Association (NYHA) Functional Class III or IV

• Presence of intramural thrombus, tumour or other abnormality that precludes safe catheter introduction or manipulation

• BMI >35 kg/m2

• Significant or symptomatic hypotension, bradycardia, or chronotropic incompetence

• Chronic renal insufficiency of <15 mL/min/1.73 m2 or any history of renal dialysis, or history of renal transplant

• Hemodynamically significant valvular disease

• Presence of patent foramen ovale (PFO) or atrial septal defect (ASD) closure device

• History of abnormal bleeding and/or clotting disorder

• History of rheumatic fever

• Severe lung disease, pulmonary hypertension, or any lung disease. Only if involving abnormal blood gases or significant dyspnoea

• Clinically significant systemic infection or sepsis

• Life expectancy <1 year

• Sensitivity to contrast media not controlled by pre-medication

• Any of the following within the 3 months prior to enrolment:

  • Myocardial infarction
  • Unstable angina
  • Percutaneous coronary intervention
  • Heart failure hospitalization
  • Stroke or TIA
  • Significant bleeding
  • Pericarditis/effusions
  • Left atrial thrombus

• Coronary artery bypass grafting/atriotomy within 6 months prior

• Organ or haematologic transplant, or currently being evaluated for an organ transplant

• Women who are pregnant or breastfeeding

Trial design

Primary purpose: Treatment

Allocation: Randomized

Interventional model: Parallel Assignment

Masking: Single Blind

---

154 participants in 2 patient groups

Radiofrequency ablation

Active Comparator group

Description:

In this group, patients will undergo the acquisition of a 3D high-density map. If pulmonary vein (PV) reconnection is identified, radiofrequency ablation (RFA) will be employed for pulmonary vein isolation (PVI). Should PV reconnection not be detected, the operator will have the discretion to determine the necessary ablation strategies. Patients falling into this category will be included in a concurrent registry.

Treatment:

Device: pulmonary vein isolation with RFA

Pulsed field ablation

Experimental group

Description:

In this group, pulmonary vein (PV) reconnection is identified by the FARAWAVE system. If reconnection is observed, pulsed field ablation (PFA) will be employed for pulmonary vein isolation (PVI). Should PV reconnection not be detected, the operator will have the discretion to determine the necessary ablation strategies. Patients falling into this category will be included in a concurrent registry.

Treatment:

Device: pulmonary vein isolation with PFA