ClinicalTrials.Veeva

Menu

Pulsed Field Ablation Versus Radiofrequency Ablation for Persistent Atrial Fibrillation (PRAISE)

Capital Medical University logo

Capital Medical University

Status

Not yet enrolling

Conditions

Pulsed Field Ablation
Persistent Atrial Fibrillation
Radiofrequency Catheter Ablation

Treatments

Device: Pulsed Field Ablation
Device: Radiofrequency Ablation

Study type

Interventional

Funder types

Other

Identifiers

NCT06791629
2025-PeAF ablation

Details and patient eligibility

About

This clinical trial aims to compare the efficacy and safety of pulsed field ablation and radiofrequency ablation to treat persistent atrial fibrillation in adults.

Participants will:

Undergo pulsed field ablation or radiofrequency ablation. Keep follow-up for at least 12 months.

Full description

Traditional treatment options for persistent atrial fibrillation (PeAF) include pharmacological management, electrical cardioversion, and catheter ablation. Pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) has become the cornerstone of ablation therapy and has been shown to be effective in clinical practice. However, its efficacy is relatively limited in patients with persistent AF compared with those with paroxysmal AF, and many patients still experience recurrence after treatment.

In recent years, linear ablation strategies based on alcohol ablation have been shown to improve the one-year maintenance of sinus rhythm in patients with PeAF. Traditional radiofrequency ablation (RF) has demonstrated good outcomes but still has certain limitations when dealing with PeAF. In several clinical studies, pulsed field ablation (PFA), an emerging and innovative technique, has shown non-inferiority in treating paroxysmal AF. Furthermore, PFA has also demonstrated significant efficacy in linear ablation sites such as the mitral isthmus line, posterior left atrial wall, and tricuspid isthmus line, highlighting its potential in treating PeAF. This study aims to compare the safety and efficacy of PFA and radiofrequency ablation (RF) in the treatment of PeAF through a multi-center, prospective, randomized, open-label, non-inferiority clinical trial, to provide a safer and more effective treatment option for clinical practice.

Enrollment

700 estimated patients

Sex

All

Ages

18+ years old

Volunteers

No Healthy Volunteers

Inclusion criteria

  • 18-80 years
  • Patients with non-valvular persistent atrial fibrillation undergoing their first catheter ablation (AF duration: 3 months to 3 years)
  • Left atrial diameter on parasternal long-axis view of echocardiogram < 50 mm
  • Agree to be randomly assigned to the ablation strategy and able to follow up

Exclusion criteria

  • Atrial fibrillation due to reversible causes
  • LVEF < 30%
  • Severe congenital heart disease
  • Severe liver or kidney dysfunction (eGFR < 15, Child-Pugh grade 3), or history of dialysis
  • History of cardiac surgery, such as coronary artery bypass grafting, mechanical valve or prosthetic valve replacement
  • History of pacemaker implantation, left atrial appendage closure, or patent foramen ovale closure
  • Contraindications to oral anticoagulation
  • Contraindications to right or left heart catheterization
  • Pregnancy
  • Life expectancy < 1 year (e.g., advanced malignancy, end-stage renal disease)
  • Currently enrolled in another trial evaluating medical devices or drugs
  • Other situations where the investigator determines the subject is unsuitable for the study

Trial design

Primary purpose

Treatment

Allocation

Randomized

Interventional model

Parallel Assignment

Masking

None (Open label)

700 participants in 2 patient groups

Radiofrequency Ablation
Active Comparator group
Treatment:
Device: Radiofrequency Ablation
Pulsed Field Ablation
Experimental group
Treatment:
Device: Pulsed Field Ablation

Trial contacts and locations

1

Loading...

Central trial contact

Deyong Long

Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov

Clinical trials

Find clinical trialsTrials by location
© Copyright 2025 Veeva Systems