ClinicalTrials.Veeva

Menu

QSPainRelief-patientCNS : Clinical Biomarkers of Nociception, Sedation and Cognition

U

Université Catholique de Louvain

Status

Not yet enrolling

Conditions

Post-operative Pain

Treatments

Diagnostic Test: Saccadic Peak Velocity
Other: Patient-reported outcomes
Diagnostic Test: N-back working memory test
Diagnostic Test: Pupillometry
Diagnostic Test: Laser-evoked potentials (LEPs)
Diagnostic Test: Body Sway Test
Diagnostic Test: Scalp electroencephalography (EEG)
Diagnostic Test: Cervical somatosensory-evoked potentials
Diagnostic Test: Adaptive tracking test
Diagnostic Test: Cognitive auditory-evoked potentials (P300)

Study type

Interventional

Funder types

Other

Identifiers

NCT04742790
VER.01-30.06.2020 (Other Identifier)
QSPainRelief-patientCNS

Details and patient eligibility

About

QSPainRelief-patientCNS is a monocentric prospective longitudinal study conducted in patients suffering from disabling post-surgical pain for which the treating physician is about to prescribe a given drug combination for the treatment of their pain with the aim of identifying measures of drug-induced effects on CNS activity that could be used as biomarkers of real-life clinical outcome, both in terms of desired treatment effects (treatment-induced pain relief) but also in terms of undesired treatment effects (treatment-induced sedation and treatment-induced cognitive dysfunction).

Full description

QSPainRelief-patientCNS is one of three clinical studies that will be conducted as part of the QSPainRelief project funded by the European Union's Horizon 2020 research and innovation program (grant agreement 848068; http://qspainrelief.eu).

Chronic pain is a complex disease affecting about 20% of Europeans, and up to 60% of patients with chronic pain do not experience adequate pain relief from currently available analgesic combinational therapies and/or suffer confounding adverse effects. Of the many conceivable combinations, only a few have been studied in formal clinical trials. Thus, physicians have to rely on clinical experience when treating chronic pain patients. The vision of the QSPainRelief project is that alternative novel drug combinations with improved analgesic and reduced adverse effects can be identified and assessed by mechanism-based Quantitative Systems Pharmacology (QSP) in silico modelling. The QSPainRelief consortium will setup, calibrate and validate an in silico QSPainRelief platform which integrates recently developed (1) physiologically based pharmacokinetic models to quantitate and adequately predict drug pharmacokinetics in human CNS, (2) target-binding kinetic models; (3) cellular signaling models and (4) a proprietary neural circuit model to quantitate the drug effects on the activity of relevant brain neuronal networks, that also adequately predicts clinical outcome.

Calibration of the QSPainRelief platform modelling the biological processes and neuronal circuits underlying the pain relief and adverse effects induced by drug combinations requires patient data on how different drug combinations affect the central processing of nociceptive input, the central processes underlying pain modulation, as well as the central nervous system (CNS) networks underlying drug-induced adverse effects. After calibration of the QSPainRelief platform, additional patient data is required to evaluate the ability of the platform to actually predict CNS effects of drug combinations in patients. Finally, real-world evidence is needed to relate the effects of drug combinations on CNS activity with the therapeutic and adverse effects self-reported by the patients.

The aims of the QSPainRelief-patientCNS study are thus two-fold.

The first aim is to obtain data from a first set of 60 patients to calibrate the QSPainRelief platform, and from a second set of 120 patients to evaluate the ability of the QSPainRelief platform to predict therapeutic and adverse effects of drug combinations. It will focus on pain relief and its impact on daily life activities as therapeutic effects, and on drug-induced sedation, drug-induced cognitive dysfunction (memory and attention) and pain medication misuse as adverse effects. These adverse effects have been chosen because (1) CNS biomarkers sensitive to drug-induced sedation and drug-induced cognitive dysfunction can be readily obtained using non-invasive measurements of the electroencephalogram (EEG) and (2) the chosen adverse effects can be assessed in patients after a short treatment period using validated patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs).

The second aim is to identify measures of drug-induced effects on CNS activity that could be used as biomarkers of real-life clinical outcome, both in terms of desired treatment effects (treatment-induced pain relief) but also in terms of undesired treatment effects (treatment-induced sedation and treatment-induced cognitive dysfunction).

Enrollment

180 estimated patients

Sex

All

Ages

18 to 75 years old

Volunteers

No Healthy Volunteers

Inclusion criteria

  • Aged 18-75 years.
  • Presence of disabling post-operative pain for more than two weeks following thoracotomy, sternotomy or breast cancer surgery.
  • Current treatment of their post-operative pain with an opioid analgesic (along with possible other drugs).
  • Decision by the treating physician to introduce an additional non-opioid treatment for their post-operative pain such as (but not necessarily) an antiepileptic or an anti-depressant.
  • Capacity to understand and voluntarily sign an informed consent form.

Exclusion criteria

  • Insufficient French language skills.
  • Planned chemotherapy, hormonotherapy or radiotherapy during the time interval between Visits 1 and 2.
  • Clinically evident psychiatric disease that is likely to interfere with the study, according to judgment by the investigator.
  • History of peripheral or central nervous system disease before the surgical intervention.
  • Dermatological condition involving the sensory testing areas.
  • Severe alcohol use disorder (as defined in DSM-5).
  • Severe sedative, hypnotic of anxiolytic-related use disorder (as defined in DSM-5).
  • Any other mild, moderate or severe substance use disorder except tobacco and caffeine (as defined in DSM-5).
  • Consumption of recreational drugs, including cannabis, in the last 4 weeks prior to the study.
  • Signs of polyneuropathy at clinical examination.
  • Signs of a neurological deficit due to a CNS lesion or dysfunction at clinical examination.
  • Any other reason to exclude the subject because it may interfere with the study, according to judgment by the investigator. The reason will be documented.

Trial design

Primary purpose

Diagnostic

Allocation

N/A

Interventional model

Single Group Assignment

Masking

None (Open label)

180 participants in 1 patient group

Patients
Experimental group
Description:
The study will recruit volunteers (1) suffering from disabling post-operative pain for more than two weeks following surgery (thoracotomy, sternotomy and breast cancer surgery), (2) currently being treated for their post-operative pain with an opioid analgesic - along with possible other treatments - and (3) for which the treating physician is about to introduce an additional non-opioid drug for the treatment of their pain (e.g. an antiepileptic or an anti-depressant).
Treatment:
Diagnostic Test: Adaptive tracking test
Diagnostic Test: Cervical somatosensory-evoked potentials
Diagnostic Test: Body Sway Test
Diagnostic Test: Pupillometry
Diagnostic Test: Scalp electroencephalography (EEG)
Diagnostic Test: Laser-evoked potentials (LEPs)
Diagnostic Test: Saccadic Peak Velocity
Other: Patient-reported outcomes
Diagnostic Test: N-back working memory test
Diagnostic Test: Cognitive auditory-evoked potentials (P300)

Trial contacts and locations

1

Loading...

Central trial contact

André Mouraux, MD, PhD

Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov

Clinical trials

Find clinical trialsTrials by location
© Copyright 2026 Veeva Systems