ClinicalTrials.Veeva

Menu

Quantitative Assessment of Pupillary Light Reflex in Acute Carbon Monoxide Poisoning

W

Wonju Severance Christian Hospital

Status

Completed

Conditions

Carbon Monoxide Poisoning

Treatments

Diagnostic Test: Automated quantitative pupillometer

Study type

Observational

Funder types

Other

Identifiers

NCT05110820
CO-pupillometer

Details and patient eligibility

About

Neurological complications after acute carbon monoxide (CO) poisoning can range from transient headache or dizziness to cognitive dysfunction, seizure, permanent anoxic brain damages or death. A recent study reported that a lack of standard pupillary light reflex (sPLR), assessed using a pen light, was a predictor of 30-day neurological sequelae in patients with CO poisoning. Given that the basic sPLR has a poor inter-rater reliability, more objective and quantitative methods are required in the assessment of PLR.

An automated pupillometer has been used in the intensive care unit to quantitatively assess the PLR. Therefore, we hypothesized that quantitative assessment of PLR might be associated with neurocognitive sequelae after acute CO poisoning. The purpose of this study was to assess the value of quantitative pupillary reactivity (NPi and qPLR) in comparison to that of sPLR in predicting neurocognitive outcome at 1 month after acute CO poisoning.

Full description

Neurological complications after acute carbon monoxide (CO) poisoning can range from transient headache or dizziness to cognitive dysfunction, seizure, permanent anoxic brain damages or death. Although hyperbaric oxygen therapy (HBO2) has been tried to minimize the neurological complications, a significant percentage of patients still suffer from neurocognitive sequelae after acute CO poisoning. A recent study reported that a lack of standard pupillary light reflex (sPLR), assessed using a pen light, was a predictor of 30-day neurological sequelae in patients with CO poisoning. Given that the basic sPLR has a poor inter-rater reliability, more objective and quantitative methods are required in the assessment of PLR.

An automated pupillometer has been used in the intensive care unit to quantitatively assess the PLR. Quantitative PLR (qPLR), which is expressed as the percentage pupillary constriction in response to a calibrated light stimulus, was better in predicting neurological outcome after cardiac arrest (CA) compared to standard light reflex. In addition, the Neurological Pupil index (NPi) has been validated as a tool for assessing prognosis after CA because it is not influenced by medications (especially opioids and neuromuscular blocking agents) or small pupil size.

Therefore, the investigators hypothesized that quantitative assessment of PLR might be associated with neurocognitive sequelae after acute CO poisoning. The purpose of this study was to assess the value of quantitative pupillary reactivity (NPi and qPLR) in comparison to that of sPLR in predicting neurocognitive outcome at 1 month after acute CO poisoning.

Enrollment

104 patients

Sex

All

Ages

19+ years old

Volunteers

No Healthy Volunteers

Inclusion criteria

  • Acute CO poisoning

Exclusion criteria

  • Age <19 years
  • Patients with a history of ophthalmic surgery which might have affected the PLR
  • Patients with baseline cognitive deficit
  • Refusal to enroll in this study
  • Discharge from the ED or transfer to another hospital within 24 hours
  • Expired in the ED
  • Co-ingestion of drugs, such as hypnotics, that may affect the PLR
  • No follow-up for the neurocognitive outcome

Trial design

104 participants in 1 patient group

Acute CO poisoning
Description:
A diagnosis of CO poisoning was made according to medical history and carboxyhaemoglobin \>5% (\>10% in smokers).
Treatment:
Diagnostic Test: Automated quantitative pupillometer

Trial contacts and locations

1

Loading...

Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov

Clinical trials

Find clinical trialsTrials by location
© Copyright 2026 Veeva Systems