ClinicalTrials.Veeva

Menu

Radiofrequency Endometrial Ablation or Uterine Artery Embolization for Treatment of Adenomyosis-related Abnormal Uterine Bleeding (ADENOTREAT)

U

University Hospital of Bordeaux

Status

Not yet enrolling

Conditions

Abnormal Uterine Bleeding Due to Adenomyosis (Disorder)

Treatments

Procedure: Uterine artery embolization
Procedure: Radiofrequency endometrial ablation
Procedure: Hysterectomy

Study type

Interventional

Funder types

Other

Identifiers

NCT07195305
CHUBX 2024/47

Details and patient eligibility

About

The present study aims to compare the efficacy (menstrual blood loss, pain, quality of life) and the safety (complications, recovery) of each conservative intervention (RFA, UAE) versus hysterectomy for the treatment of adenomyosis-related abnormal uterine bleeding, up to 2 years

Full description

Adenomyosis is defined by the presence of ectopic non-atypical endometrial glands and stroma within the smooth muscle fibers of the myometrium causing reactive hypertrophy of the uterus. The prevalence of adenomyosis is approximately 20% before 40 years, and probably higher in the following decade. One-third of women with adenomyosis are symptomatic. Symptoms include abnormal uterine bleeding (AUB) (40-50%), pelvic pain (dysmenorrhea 15-30%, dyspareunia) and are related to the uniformly enlarged and globular uterus (distension, swelling). Adenomyosis can be diagnosed by transvaginal ultrasonography and/or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Symptoms associated with adenomyosis can be treated by hormonal or non-hormonal medications. When medical treatment fails, a hysterectomy is proposed to women who do not consider childbearing. For women who wish to preserve their uterus, two alternatives are possible.

Radiofrequency ablation (RFA) is intended to ablate the endometrial lining of the uterus on pre-menopausal women with AUB due to benign causes for whom childbearing is complete. This outpatient procedure is well tolerated, with 10% of post-operative adverse events within one year, mainly not serious like pelvic pain/cramping and vaginal discharge/infection.

Uterine artery embolization (UAE) is as a minimally invasive treatment for symptomatic uterine fibroids since 1995. This procedure is also well tolerated, with efficacy and satisfaction rates of 85% at 2 years, performed usually as a day case or with a short hospital stay of 12-24h to manage immediate post-operative pain.

Therefore the extension of the indications of both techniques in AUB associated with adenomyosis should be questioned.

The present study aims to compare the efficacy (menstrual blood loss, pain, quality of life) and the safety (complications, recovery) of each conservative intervention (RFA, UAE) versus hysterectomy for the treatment of adenomyosis-related abnormal uterine bleeding, up to 2 years

Enrollment

230 estimated patients

Sex

Female

Ages

30 to 50 years old

Volunteers

No Healthy Volunteers

Inclusion criteria

  • Premenopausal women aged 30 to 50 years
  • Women who had at least 3 prior months failed medical therapy, or a contraindication to medical therapy, or refused medical therapy for adenomyosis-related AUB
  • Symptomatic pure internal adenomyosis or dominant adenomyosis (with less than 5 concurrent uterine fibroids type 3-7 < 5 cm) confirmed by MRI (< 6 months) according to ESHRE criteria
  • AUB defined as a PBAC score >100 at baseline
  • Uterine ultrasound measurement of 6.0-12.0 cm (external os to internal fundus)
  • Women with an indication for hysterectomy for adenomyosis-related AUB and accepting hysterectomy
  • Highly effective contraception for women of childbearing potential, maintained until the onset of menopause
  • Affiliated or beneficiary of health insurance
  • Signed informed consent

Exclusion criteria

  • Uterine cavity abnormality or obstruction confirmed via imaging modalities or hysteroscopy
  • Deep infiltrating posterior subperitoneal endometriosis involving contiguous digestive tract structures
  • Uterine malignancy within the last five years
  • Secreting ovarian tumor
  • Atypical endometrial hyperplasia
  • Unaddressed high grade cervical intra-epithelial lesions
  • Active sexually transmitted disease or pelvic inflammatory disease
  • Documented or suspected coagulopathies or long-term blood-thinner medications
  • Prior transmural myomectomy or prior endometrial ablation
  • Plasma FSH level > 40 IU/mL
  • Any contraindication to angiography (including iodine allergy and creatinine clearance < 60mL/min)
  • Any contraindication to MRI (claustrophobia, pace maker, etc.)
  • Any contraindication to the use of Embosphere®, Embozene® or NovaSure® according to the instruction for use
  • Women who are pregnant, breastfeeding, or who are planning to become pregnant
  • Any condition or any situation that would prohibit women from coming to the investigational center for the 6 months follow-up
  • Women unable to understand the nature, risks, significance and implications of the clinical investigation
  • Women under legal protection

Trial design

Primary purpose

Treatment

Allocation

Randomized

Interventional model

Parallel Assignment

Masking

None (Open label)

230 participants in 3 patient groups

Radiofrequency endometrial ablation
Experimental group
Description:
Radiofrequency endometrial ablation performed using NovaSure®
Treatment:
Procedure: Radiofrequency endometrial ablation
Uterine artery embolization
Experimental group
Description:
Uterine artery embolization carried out under the guidance of digital subtraction angiography
Treatment:
Procedure: Uterine artery embolization
Hysterectomy
Active Comparator group
Description:
Hysterectomy
Treatment:
Procedure: Hysterectomy

Trial contacts and locations

1

Loading...

Central trial contact

Marc Sapoval, MD, PhD; Jean-Luc Brun, MD, PhD

Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov

Clinical trials

Find clinical trialsTrials by location
© Copyright 2025 Veeva Systems