Status and phase
Conditions
Treatments
About
The objective is to compare IV vernakalant to IV procainamide for the ED management of acute AF patients. If vernakalant proves to be more effective, faster, and safer than IV procainamide, this will give clinicians an important alternative for pharmacological cardioversion of acute AF. The investigators propose a pragmatic comparative effectiveness trial entailing an open label, randomized controlled trial at 12 large Canadian EDs. Study subjects will be randomized to 1 of 2 treatment arms: 1) Patients will receive an initial infusion of 3mg/kg of IV vernakalant over 10 minutes, followed by a second dose of 2mg/kg over 10 minutes, if necessary, or 2) Patients will receive a continuous infusion of 15mg/kg of IV procainamide over 60 minutes. The primary aim will be to compare conversion to normal sinus rhythm between the two drugs. The investigators will include stable patients presenting with an episode of acute AF of at least 3 hours duration, where symptoms require urgent management and where immediate cardioversion is a reasonable option. Using the integrated consent model, research assistants will obtain verbal consent from eligible patients.
Enrollment
Sex
Ages
Volunteers
Inclusion and exclusion criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
The investigators will include stable (see below) patients presenting with an episode of acute non-valvular AF of at least 3 hours duration and no greater than 7 days, where symptoms require urgent management and where immediate cardioversion is a reasonable option because:
i) onset < 12 hours ago, or ii) if onset 12 - 48 hours ago and there are <2 of these CHADS-65 criteria (age ≥ 65, diabetes, hypertension, heart failure), or iii) negative for thrombus on transesophageal echocardiography. Of note, we will not exclude patients with prior episodes of acute AF. Patients will only be enrolled if the attending physician is confident about time of onset, based upon the patient's symptoms. Physicians are well aware of the importance of this determination and will not attempt to cardiovert patients otherwise.
Exclusion Criteria: The investigators will exclude patients who have any of the reasons listed below.
Appropriateness:
Safety
Primary purpose
Allocation
Interventional model
Masking
350 participants in 2 patient groups
Loading...
Central trial contact
Ian G Stiell, MD, MSc; Erica Brown
Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov
Clinical trials
Research sites
Resources
Legal