Randomized Clinical Trial of Nasal Turbinate Reduction to Improve Continuous Positive Airway Pressure (CPAP) Outcomes for Sleep Apnea (TURBO)

University of Washington

Status and phase: Completed; Phase 2

Conditions: Nasal Obstruction; Sleep Apnea Syndromes; Turbinate Hypertrophy

Treatments: Procedure: Sham RF; Procedure: Radiofrequency Turbinate Reduction

Study type: Interventional

Funder types: Other; NIH

Identifiers

NCT00503802

R01HL084139 (U.S. NIH Grant/Contract)

30678-D

06-3050-D 02 (Other Identifier)

Details and patient eligibility

About

Obstructive sleep apnea occurs in 2-4% of middle age adults and results in significant morbidity and mortality. The first line therapy is provision of continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) via a nasal mask chronically. Nasal resistance related to nasal turbinate enlargement may compromise CPAP treatment. This randomized double-blind sham-placebo-controlled trial tests the hypothesis that nasal turbinate reduction improves the nasal passage, CPAP use, and sleep apnea quality of life in newly diagnosed sleep apnea patients who are recommended CPAP therapy.

Full description

Obstructive sleep apnea syndrome afflicts at least 2 - 4% of adults and is associated with significant morbidity and mortality. Continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) therapy is the primary treatment for sleep apnea in adults, but non-adherence to CPAP limits its effectiveness. Even with maximal medical therapy, nasal obstruction is common in sleep apnea patients and may hamper both CPAP adherence and efficacy. However, the most common cause of nasal obstruction in sleep apnea patients (turbinate hypertrophy) is surgically correctable. Treatment of nasal obstruction may lead to more successful use of CPAP. The long-term goal of the proposed research is to develop a novel, multi-disciplinary, multi-modal approach to therapy, in order to improve clinically important treatment outcomes for sleep apnea. The short-term objectives of this proposal are to:

1. Quantify the effect of nasal turbinate reduction on the nasal airway;
2. Determine whether turbinate reduction increases CPAP use or efficacy; and
3. Determine whether turbinate reduction positively influences CPAP treatment outcomes.

We will employ a single-site, randomized, double-blind, sham-placebo-controlled trial to test the hypotheses that turbinate reduction:

1. increases nasal airway cross-sectional area;
2. increases mean nightly objective CPAP use; and
3. improves sleep apnea quality of life 3 months after CPAP titration.

We will use the radiofrequency turbinate reduction surgical technique, which allows ethical randomization and effective blinding. Three, six, and 12 months after turbinate reduction and CPAP titration we will measure the change in the minimal nasal cross-sectional area, level of CPAP use, and improvement in sleep apnea quality of life. Secondary outcomes will capture this treatment's broader impact on the nose, CPAP, and sleep apnea. If turbinate reduction can be shown to improve sleep apnea outcomes through increased use or efficacy of CPAP therapy, this trial will demonstrate the value and effectiveness of a novel, multidisciplinary, combined medical-surgical approach to the management of obstructive sleep apnea syndrome.

Enrollment: 242 patients

Sex: All

Ages: 18 to 80 years old

Volunteers: No Healthy Volunteers

Inclusion criteria

• Age 18-80 years
• Newly diagnosed obstructive sleep apnea (apnea-hypopnea index >= 5 events/hour)
• CPAP therapy recommended
• Persistent bilateral inferior turbinate hypertrophy
• American Society of Anesthesiologists Class I-III
• Ability to give informed consent
• Ability and willingness to complete the study protocol
• Fluency in verbal and written English

Exclusion criteria

• Previous surgical turbinate treatment
• Other nasal disorders (i.e. recurrent epistaxis, desiccated or crusted mucosa, severe bilateral obstructing septal deformity, or obstructing polyposis)
• Active respiratory tract infections
• Coagulopathy
• Severe psychiatric comorbidity (taking anti-psychotic medication)
• American Society of Anesthesiologists Class IV or V
• Pregnancy
• No telephone
• Plans of moving during the study period
• Known contraindication to lidocaine with epinephrine, oxymetazoline, or acetaminophen

Trial design

Primary purpose: Treatment

Allocation: Randomized

Interventional model: Parallel Assignment

Masking: Triple Blind

---

242 participants in 2 patient groups

1

Active Comparator group

Description:

Active RF treatment

Treatment:

Procedure: Radiofrequency Turbinate Reduction

2

Sham Comparator group

Description:

Sham RF treatment

Treatment:

Procedure: Sham RF