ClinicalTrials.Veeva

Menu

Randomized, Controlled Multicenter Trial of Vacuum Assisted Closure Therapy™ in Diabetic Foot Ulcers

K

KCI USA, Inc

Status

Completed

Conditions

Diabetic Foot Ulcers

Treatments

Device: Moist Wound Therapy
Device: VAC Therapy

Study type

Interventional

Funder types

Industry

Identifiers

NCT00432965
VAC2001-08

Details and patient eligibility

About

To determine if topical negative pressure therapy delivered by the V.A.C.® device is clinically efficacious and cost effective in the treatment of diabetic foot ulcers.

The purpose of this study is to compare the effectiveness of V.A.C.® Therapy to moist wound therapy of diabetic foot ulcers. The primary objective is to determine the effect of V.A.C.® Therapy on the incidence of complete wound closure.

Enrollment

335 patients

Sex

All

Ages

18+ years old

Volunteers

No Healthy Volunteers

Inclusion criteria

  • Presence of a calcaneal, dorsal or plantar diabetic foot ulcer ≥ 2 cm2 in area after debridement. (If more than one ulcer is present, all wounds will be treated using the same method, but only one ulcer will be studied.)
  • DFU equivalent to Stage 2 or greater, as defined by Wagner's Scale system (See Appendix E)
  • Evidence of adequate perfusion by one of the following on the affected extremity,(within the past 60 days):Dorsum transcutaneous oxygen test (TcPO2) with results of ≥30 mmHg, or ABIs with results of ≥0.7 and ≤1.2 and toe pressures with results of ≥30 mmHg, or Doppler arterial waveforms, which are triphasic or biphasic at the ankle in the affected leg.
  • Age ≥ 18 years of age
  • HbA1c ≤ 12% (collected within the last 90 days.)
  • Evidence of adequate nutrition by one of the following:
  • Lab results reflecting Pre-Albumin >16 mg/dl and Albumin level is >3 g/dl (during the seven days prior to the study period), or a nutritional consult will be done and with appropriate supplementation started. Proper documentation on CRFs is needed.

Exclusion criteria

  • Patients with recognized active Charcot abnormalities of the foot, as evidence by clinical symptoms that interfere with either randomized treatment group
  • Ulcers resulting from electrical, chemical, or radiation burns, or venous insufficiency
  • Untreated infection or cellulites at site of target ulcer
  • Presence of untreated osteomyelitis
  • Collagen vascular disease
  • Malignancy in the ulcer
  • Presence of necrotic tissue
  • Uncontrolled hyperglycemia
  • Concomitant medications that include (washout period of 30 days for corticosteroids, immunosuppressive medications, or chemotherapy)
  • Open amputations
  • Prior V.A.C. therapy within 30 days.
  • Current or prior normothermic (Warm-UP®) or HBO therapy within 30 days.
  • Current or prior treatment with recombinant or autologous growth factor products within the past 30 days. (Examples: Regranex or Procuren)
  • Current or prior treatment with skin or dermal substitutes and dressings (Examples: Apligraft, Dermagraft, or Integra) with living cells capable of producing growth factors (Example: Oasis) within the past 30 days.
  • Current use of any enzymatic debridment agent (Example: Acuzyme /Panafil) during the active treatment phase of the study
  • Pregnant or nursing mothers.

Trial design

Primary purpose

Treatment

Allocation

Randomized

Interventional model

Parallel Assignment

Masking

None (Open label)

335 participants in 2 patient groups

VAC Therapy
Experimental group
Description:
Treatment of Diabetic Foot Ulcers with VAC Therapy
Treatment:
Device: VAC Therapy
Moist Wound Therapy
Active Comparator group
Description:
Moist Wound Therapy (standard of care)
Treatment:
Device: Moist Wound Therapy

Trial contacts and locations

25

Loading...

Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov

Clinical trials

Find clinical trialsTrials by location
© Copyright 2026 Veeva Systems