ClinicalTrials.Veeva

Menu

Randomized Study Comparing Two Established Gastrointestinal Suture Techniques - One-layer-continuous Versus Double-layer-continuous Suture (ANATECH)

U

Universitätsmedizin Mannheim

Status and phase

Terminated
Phase 3

Conditions

Colo-colonic Anastomoses
Ileo-colonic Anastomoses

Treatments

Procedure: Single-layer suture
Procedure: double layer-suture

Study type

Interventional

Funder types

Other

Identifiers

NCT00996554
EK II-MA 0263.5

Details and patient eligibility

About

The purpose of this study is to examine the frequency of postoperative complications depending on the number of suture layers in colo-colonic and ileo-colonic anastomoses Hypothesis: double-layer suture has less anastomotic leakages compared to single-layer suture.

Enrollment

252 patients

Sex

All

Ages

18+ years old

Volunteers

No Healthy Volunteers

Inclusion criteria

  • at least 18 years old,
  • planned for elective surgery
  • at least one hand-sutured ileo-colonic or colo-colonic anastomosis

Exclusion criteria

  • ASA-Score > 3,
  • missing written consent of the informed patient
  • no existing choice between suture-techniques according to the surgeon
  • patient not able to cooperate/non-compliance
  • rectal anastomoses

Trial design

Primary purpose

Treatment

Allocation

Randomized

Interventional model

Parallel Assignment

Masking

Triple Blind

252 participants in 2 patient groups

Double-Layer-Suture
Experimental group
Description:
Hand-sutured end-to-end or end-to-side anastomosis performed by double-layer continuous technique (monofil thread)
Treatment:
Procedure: double layer-suture
Single-layer suture
Active Comparator group
Description:
Hand-sutured end-to-end or end-to-side anastomosis performed by single-layer continuous technique (monofil thread).
Treatment:
Procedure: Single-layer suture

Trial contacts and locations

1

Loading...

Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov

Clinical trials

Find clinical trialsTrials by location
© Copyright 2026 Veeva Systems