Status
Conditions
Treatments
About
Head to Head comparison of perioperative complications and secondary the impact of operation techniques with or without mesh on patients suffering from pelvic organ prolapse on quality of life.
Full description
During the last decade a substantial progress in the detailed knowledge of morphology and function of different compartments of the female pelvic floor was achieved. The obtained informations were quickly implemented in the clinical practice especially in the application of special meshes and of novel techniques of their implantation. Their success rate was evaluated only in pilot companies supported studies. We do miss randomised studies not sponsored by company comparing different surgical techniques and their impact on the quality of life (QoL); the objective estimation of those consequences is for the longlasting effect of the surgery inevitable. The new methods bring also new complications which were not yet relevantly and objectively documented.
In the study we compare the techniques contemporary used - in the groups with or without mesh, in size relevant for the statistical evaluation
Enrollment
Sex
Ages
Volunteers
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Primary purpose
Allocation
Interventional model
Masking
200 participants in 2 patient groups
Loading...
Central trial contact
Kamil Svabik, MD; Michael Krcmar, MD
Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov
Clinical trials
Research sites
Resources
Legal