Status
Conditions
Treatments
Study type
Funder types
Identifiers
About
Rapid volume expansion using repeated intravenous fluid boluses is a very common intervention performed in the intensive care unit (ICU) in the early days of resuscitation of patients with shock. Once passed the initial phase of resuscitation, the fluid boluses administered fail to effectively increase the patients' cardiac output in about 50% of cases. Pulse pressure changes or stroke volume changes induced by a Passive Leg Raising (PLR) test have acceptable/good ability to predict fluid responsiveness (in terms of cardiac output change) and may be systematically used in patients with persistent shock with the aim of limiting the total amount of fluid administered to patients by avoiding undue fluid boluses. One may suppose that such a volume expansion management policy could impact morbidity and mortality of shocked patients. Among the predictive indices available in clinical practice, the PLR test has the advantages of being usable regardless of the patients' respiratory status and cardiac rhythm. Changes in left ventricular stroke volume during the PLR test perform better that changes in pulse pressure to predict fluid responsiveness. However, in counterpart, pulse pressure changes during PLR can be assessed without the need of other hemodynamic exploration such central venous pressure measurement or cardiac output monitoring. The investigators hypothesized that strategies using either stroke volume changes or pulse pressure changes induced by the PLR test to decide wether a fluid bolus clinically deemed indicated should or should not be administered, may limit the amount of fluid received by the patients during the first 5 days of shock, improve their oxygenation index, and shorten the time passed under mechanical ventilation, as compared to a "liberal" strategy (usual care) that does not use predictive indices of fluid responsiveness.
Full description
A pilot, single-center, randomized, open-label, 3 parallel groups clinical trial with 1:1:1 assignment of interventions, comparing outcomes between patients with persistent shock assigned to either 1) the "Volume expansion guided by PLR-induced changes in Stroke Volume" strategy, or 2) the "Volume expansion guided by PLR-induced changes in Pulse Pressure" strategy, or 3) to usual care (i.e., without the use of any predictive index of fluid responsiveness). Patients in shock (either of septic, cardiac or other origin) will be included once passed the first hours of resuscitation. The time window for inclusion will be from 6 to 24 hours after the beginning of resuscitation, a delay necessary to ensure that initial hypovolemia has been fully compensated.
The randomization will be stratified according to the presumed origin of shock (cardiac, septic, or other) and according to the PaO2/FiO2 ratio (<200 or ≥ 200 mmHg).
The randomly assigned intervention will be used during the first 5 days of shock (120 hours).
Enrollment
Sex
Ages
Volunteers
Inclusion and exclusion criteria
Pre-eligibility criteria:
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Shock began more than 24 hours ago
Age < 18 yrs.
Pregnancy
Uncontrolled haemorrhage
Intra-aortic balloon counterpulsation in place
Patient under veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (V-A ECMO)
Cardiogenic pulmonary oedema during the past 24 hours
Patient equipped with a cardiac output monitoring device
Brain death
Moribund patient
Traction of a lower limb
Amputated lower limb above the ankle level
Documented intra-abdominal hypertension
Cardiac arrest motivating ICU admission or cardiac arrest since admission 14. Patient without social security number 15. Consent refusal
Primary purpose
Allocation
Interventional model
Masking
98 participants in 3 patient groups
Loading...
Central trial contact
Aurélie Despujols; Thierry Boulain, MD
Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov
Clinical trials
Research sites
Resources
Legal