ClinicalTrials.Veeva

Menu

Rapid, Minimally-invasive Voluntary Adult Male Circumcision

S

Simunye Primary Health Care

Status

Completed

Conditions

Circumcision

Treatments

Procedure: Surgical Control
Procedure: Unicirc with tissue adhesive

Study type

Interventional

Funder types

Other

Identifiers

NCT01998360
Unicirc 002

Details and patient eligibility

About

This study will evaluate a new, minimally-invasive surgical circumcision technique for men, which is easy to learn and perform, is safe, and is associated with high patient satisfaction and excellent cosmetic results.

Full description

Voluntary medical male circumcision (VMMC) is a priority preventive intervention for HIV transmission. Currently, the most widely used VMMC technique in South Africa is open surgical circumcision.

According to the Framework for Clinical Evaluation of Devices for Adult Male Circumcision (WHO, 2011): "WHO and other health authorities wish to identify one or more devices that (a) would make the VMMC safer, easier, and quicker; (b) would have more rapid healing than current methods and/or might entail less risk of HIV transmission in the post-operative period; (c) could be performed safely by health-care providers with a minimal level of training; and (d) would be cost-effective compared to standard surgical methods for male circumcision scale up."

This quasi-experimental compares the open surgical technique to an alternative minimally-invasive technique using the disposable Unicirc device with tissue adhesive. The controls come from a separate randomized controlled trial (Unicirc 001) that was conducted just prior to the Unicirc 002 case series of 50 subjects. The investigators postulate that VMMC using the Unicirc device meets WHO criteria for the ideal method to scale up: it is an easier technique to learn and perform, requires less intraoperative time, is safer for both surgeons and patients, heals quicker, and is more cost effective than other currently available techniques. The disposable nature of the device is an immense advantage as it eliminates the need to sterilize and can therefore be used in resource-limited settings. It also reduces the chances of infection caused by contaminated instruments.

Enrollment

100 patients

Sex

Male

Ages

18 to 99 years old

Volunteers

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Inclusion criteria

Healthy men at least 18 years of age requesting circumcision

No anatomical penile abnormalities or infections

Able to provide informed consent to participate

Willing to participate in follow-up visits -

Exclusion criteria

Current illness

Penile abnormality or infection which contraindicates or would complicate circumcision

History of bleeding disorder

Past reaction to local anesthetic

Trial design

Primary purpose

Treatment

Allocation

Non-Randomized

Interventional model

Parallel Assignment

Masking

None (Open label)

100 participants in 2 patient groups

Unicirc with tissue adhesive
Experimental group
Description:
Excision of foreskin with Unicirc device and sealing wound with tissue adhesive
Treatment:
Procedure: Unicirc with tissue adhesive
Surgical control
Active Comparator group
Description:
Surgical circumcision using forceps guided, dorsal slit, or sleeve method
Treatment:
Procedure: Surgical Control

Trial contacts and locations

1

Loading...

Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov

Clinical trials

Find clinical trialsTrials by location
© Copyright 2026 Veeva Systems