Status
Conditions
About
Some data have suggested a clinical survival benefit related to the reintroduction of anti-EGFRs therapy in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). Based on resistance mechanisms related to the development of resistant clones, the investigators could assume that patients who benefited most from the reintroduction of anti-EGFRs were those who, through interval chemotherapy, had no longer mutated RAS clone in plasma that appeared during the progression with the first anti-EGFR treatment. Conversely, those who did not benefit from this therapy were probably patients who had mutated RAS clones circulating at the time of reintroduction of anti-EGFRs. To support this hypothesis, investigators propose to evaluate the correlation between the eventual presence of RAS mutations in circulating blood and the efficacy of an anti-EGFR therapy reintroduction in patients with mCRC.
Full description
Somatic mutations in KRAS exon 2 are considered as a predictive marker of lack of efficacy for anti-EGFR therapy (panitumumab or cetuximab) in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. Recently, it has been shown that rare mutations of KRAS (exons 3 or 4) or NRAS (exons 2, 3 and 4) were also predictive for resistance to anti-EGFR antibodies. These data led to a further restriction of anti-EGFR therapy to the subgroup of patients without any RAS mutations.
Emerging RAS mutations in circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) could be detected in patients with RAS non-mutated colorectal cancer treated with anti-EGFR. The appearance in blood of these rare RAS mutated clones during anti-EGFR therapy was associated with shorter progression free-survival. These results suggest that the growing and development of rare RAS mutated clone, which is probably pre-existing in the primary tumor, may constitute a mechanism of resistance for anti-EGFR therapy.
A phase II prospective study has evaluated the interest of reintroduction of cetuximab in 39 patients previously treated with irinotecan and cetuximab. For inclusion, patients should have had a clinical benefit (stable disease for at least 6 months or clinical response) with the previous line of cetuximab plus irinotecan therapy and then a progression disease for which underwent a new line of chemotherapy before the rechallenge of cetuximab plus irinotecan. The median number of line of chemotherapy before inclusion was 4, and the median interval time between last cycle of first cetuximab-based therapy and first cycle of the retreatment was 6 months. In this study, the overall response rate was 53.8%, and the median progression free-survival was 6.6 months. No evaluation of circulating tumor DNA was performed in this study.
These data indicate that the colorectal cancer genome adapts dynamically to intermittent drug schedules and provide a molecular explanation for the efficacy of rechallenge therapies based on EGFR blockage. It seems that efficacy of anti-EGFR reintroduction could be specifically observed in subgroup of patients who no longer have a RAS mutated clone following the interval chemotherapy.
The aim of this prospective non-interventional study is to evaluate the predictive impact of RAS mutations in circulating tumor DNA for efficacy of anti-EGFR reINTROduction (RASINTRO study) treatment in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer.
The primary endpoint will be the correlation between RAS mutations status in circulating tumor DNA and progression-free survival from the reintroduction of anti-EGFR therapy.
The blood sample for circulating tumor DNA assessment will be carried out in patients who agreed to participate in this observational study just before the first 3 cycles of chemotherapy. This study does not require any additional invasive procedures to those already scheduled for routine care. Indeed, blood sample will be collected from the Huber needle previously implanted in the port-a-cath for chemotherapy perfusion.
After DNA extraction from bood samples, RAS mutation testing will be performed using sequencing with a panel of genes (Ion AmpliSeq Colon and Lung Cancer Panel).
The data related to the patient (age at diagnosis, sex, weight, height, WHO performance status), tumor (tumor markers CEA and CA 19-9, histological type and tumor differentiation, tumor stage, and metastatic sites) and treatment (resection of the primary tumor, date of surgery, lines of chemotherapy, protocol regimen) will be collected anonymously. Monitoring data concern the efficacy of chemotherapy (tumor response, the date of disease progression/death).
Enrollment
Sex
Ages
Volunteers
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
73 participants in 1 patient group
Loading...
Central trial contact
Aziz ZAANAN, MD, PhD; Pierre LAURENT-PUIG, MD, PhD
Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov
Clinical trials
Research sites
Resources
Legal