ClinicalTrials.Veeva

Menu

RCT of Air Insufflation Versus Water Infusion Colonoscopy by Supervised Trainees

E

East Bay Institute for Research and Education

Status

Completed

Conditions

Colorectal Cancer

Treatments

Procedure: Colonoscopy for colorectal cancer screening
Procedure: Water Infusion Colonoscopy
Procedure: Air insufflation colonoscopy

Study type

Interventional

Funder types

Other

Identifiers

NCT00841282
EBIRE-GI-002

Details and patient eligibility

About

Our aim is to perform a randomized-controlled trial comparing air insufflation sedated colonoscopy (conventional method) vs. water infusion sedated colonoscopy (study method) by supervised trainees. Randomized trials demonstrating reduced need for sedation medications without compromising patients' comfort, cecal intubation rates or polyps detection may cause a paradigm shift and positively alter the way traditional colonoscopy is performed and future endoscopists are trained.

Full description

Background: A novel water method permitted 52% of patients accepting on-demand sedation to complete colonoscopy without medications and significantly increased successful cecal intubation from 76% to 97% in patients accepting scheduled unsedated colonoscopy.

Aim: To perform a randomized controlled trial comparing air insufflation (conventional method) vs. water infusion in lieu of air (study method) colonoscopy in minimally sedated patients by supervised trainees.

Hypothesis: Compared with the conventional method, patients examined by the study method have lower pain scores and require less medication but have similar cecal intubation rate and willingness to repeat future colonoscopy.

Setting: Outpatient colonoscopy in a single VA hospital Methods: After informed consent and standard bowel preparation, patients received pre-medications administered as 0.5 increment of Fentanyl (25 μg) and 0.5 increment of Versed (1 mg) plus 50 mg Diphenhydramine. The conventional and the study method for colonoscopy were implemented as previously described. Additional pain medications were administered at the patients' request.

Outcome measures: Increments of medications, pain scores, cecal intubation and willingness to repeat colonoscopy.

Limitations: Single VA site, older male population

Enrollment

62 patients

Sex

All

Ages

50 to 80 years old

Volunteers

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Inclusion criteria

  • Adult (> 50 years old) male and female patients who are scheduled and consented for screening or surveillance colonoscopy,
  • Accept randomization to the study or the conventional method, and agree to complete study questionnaires
  • The adults will be normal healthy patients or patients with mild systemic disease, ASA 1 or ASA 2

Exclusion criteria

  • Patients who have contraindications for sedation, decline to participate, unable to give informed consent or complete the questionnaires due to language or other difficulties will be excluded
  • Excluded patients will be managed by usual procedures

Trial design

Primary purpose

Treatment

Allocation

Randomized

Interventional model

Single Group Assignment

Masking

Single Blind

62 participants in 2 patient groups, including a placebo group

1
Active Comparator group
Description:
Water Infusion in lieu of Air Insufflation Colonoscopy
Treatment:
Procedure: Colonoscopy for colorectal cancer screening
Procedure: Water Infusion Colonoscopy
2
Placebo Comparator group
Description:
Air Insufflation Colonoscopy
Treatment:
Procedure: Air insufflation colonoscopy
Procedure: Colonoscopy for colorectal cancer screening

Trial contacts and locations

1

Loading...

Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov

Clinical trials

Find clinical trialsTrials by location
© Copyright 2025 Veeva Systems