Reattachment of the SPR Versus the Bone Block Procedure for Recurrent Peroneal Tendon Dislocation

Peking University

Status: Completed

Conditions: Recurrent Peroneal Tendon Dislocation

Treatments: Procedure: bone block procedure; Procedure: Reattachment of the superior peroneal retinaculum

Study type: Observational

Funder types: Other

Identifiers

NCT04955665

M2018225

Details and patient eligibility

About

Clinical outcomes between reattachment of the superior peroneal retinaculum (SPR) and the bone block procedure were compared in this study to elucidate which procedure was safer and more effective.

Full description

From 2012 to 2016, 25 patients with recurrent peroneal tendon dislocation underwent the bone block procedure(group A), and another 22 patients underwent reattachment of the SPR (group B). American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle society (AOFAS) ankle-hindfoot score, Ankle Activity Score (AAS), time to return to sports activity, rate of return to sports level, range of motion (ROM) of the ankle, rate of recurrence, and overall patient satisfaction were collected to evaluate outcomes between the two groups.

Enrollment: 47 patients

Sex: All

Volunteers: No Healthy Volunteers

Inclusion criteria

• a traumatic recurrent peroneal tendon dislocation requiring surgery
• a lack of response to at least 3 months of conservative treatment

Exclusion criteria

• the presence of an acute peroneal tendon dislocation
• a concomitant anterior talofibular ligament rupture

Trial design

47 participants in 2 patient groups

Bone block procedure

Description:

patients with recurrent peroneal tendon dislocation underwent the bone block procedure

Treatment:

Procedure: bone block procedure

Reattachment of the superior peroneal retinaculum

Description:

patients with recurrent peroneal tendon dislocation underwent reattachment of the superior peroneal retinaculum

Treatment:

Procedure: Reattachment of the superior peroneal retinaculum