Status
Conditions
Treatments
About
Adolescents spend the majority of the day sedentary, especially at school whilst sitting in class and at home when performing school-related tasks. As high levels of sedentary time are associated with adverse health effects, effective interventions are needed. To improve effectiveness, literature recommends a co-creative approach in which adolescents and other key stakeholders (such as teachers) are actively involved in the choice and development of intervention strategies. Therefore, this project aims to co-adapt a previously co-created intervention targeting adolescents' school-related sedentary behaviour. Further, the effect of this co-adapted intervention on adolescents' sedentary behaviour and related determinants, sleep, and mental wellbeing will be evaluated via a three-arm clustered controlled trial, including a co-adaptation intervention arm, a standard intervention arm (including schools that were not involved in co-adapting the intervention) and a control arm (continuing their curriculum as usual). By comparing these three arms, the investigators can evaluate the added value of co-creation compared to not involving adolescents or stakeholders in the development of an intervention. Lastly, the investigators will conduct a process evaluation of (1) the co-adaptation approach used to adapt the co-created intervention and (2) the implementation of both the co-adapted and standard interventions. Studies that evaluate co-created interventions are scarce. However, if such interventions prove to be more effective, this approach could be promising to change adolescents' health behaviour.
Full description
4.1. Process evaluation of the co-adaptation process and implementation of the interventions After each design session with pupils or teachers, researchers facilitating the session will complete a reflection form. These forms are used to reflect on the group process (e.g., if everyone participated) and the facilitators' role (e.g., if facilitators involved everyone). This way, facilitators can identify areas for improvement in subsequent sessions.
A trained female researcher with expertise in qualitative research will conduct 12 focus groups-6 with pupils and 6 with teachers. A second researcher will co-facilitate these focus groups and take notes. In the co-adaptation intervention schools, separate focus groups will be held with pupils and teachers after the co-adaptation process and after implementation. In the standard intervention schools, focus groups will be conducted only after the intervention has been implemented. At the start of each focus group, the interviewer will outline the goal of the focus group. Next, a semi-structured focus group will be conducted using an interview guide. Topics that will be discussed include: delivery (the extent to which the co-adaptation process and/or intervention was implemented as planned), participation (the level of engagement and participation of individuals or groups in the co-adaptation process and/or intervention), experience (subjective perceptions and evaluation of the co-adaptation process and/or intervention), context (social, cultural, economic, and political factors influencing the success or failure of the intervention), impact (the extent to which the co-adaptation process and/or intervention achieved its intended outcome(s), such as the impact on sedentary behaviour, but also the perceived impact on aspects such as pupils' classroom behaviour), and maintenance (the degree to which the relationships and/or outcomes formed during the co-adaptation process and/or intervention are sustained). Focus groups will be recorded and transcribed verbatim for analysis. In addition to the focus groups, a questionnaire will be administered to pupils and teachers after the implementation of the intervention, covering the delivery of the intervention and the participation of pupils in the intervention.
4.2 Effect evaluation Sedentary time and sleep duration will be measured using the GENEActiv accelerometer (ActivInsights Ltd., Kimbolton, UK), a waterproof tri-axial accelerometer (43 mm × 40 mm × 13 mm, 16 g). The accelerometer will be worn at the non-dominant wrist continuously over seven days using a 24-hour protocol. Data will be downloaded using the GENEActiv software and subsequently processed and analysed in R (R Development Core Team, 2010) using the GGIR package. Raw tri-axial acceleration values will be converted into a single omnidirectional measure of body acceleration using the Euclidean norm minus one (ENMO) metric. Data will then be reduced by averaging values over 1-second epochs. To determine physical activity intensity, the investigators will apply validated cut-points, classifying sedentary behaviour as values below 56.3 mg, light-intensity physical activity as values ranging from 56.3 to 191.6 mg, moderate-intensity physical activity as values between 191.6 and 695.8 mg, and vigorous-intensity physical activity as values exceeding 695.8 mg. Sedentary time and sedentary behaviour patterns, will be analysed across the entire day, during class hours, outside class hours (e.g., recess), and outside school hours.
To detect sleep, GGIR identifies periods of sustained inactivity. Sustained inactivity is defined as a period in which there is a change in arm angle of less than five degrees over a five-minute period. These thresholds have shown good accuracy for detecting sleep without the use of an activity diary compared to polysomnography, the gold standard sleep measure.
GGIR also estimates non-wear time by identifying periods of sustained low acceleration. Non-wear time will be determined when, for at least two out of three axes, the standard deviation of raw accelerometer data is less than 13 milligravity units (mg) and the data range is below 50 mg over 60-minute blocks, assessed every 15 minutes. GGIR provides two estimates to determine data validity: the number of valid hours and the fraction (%) of the night identified as invalid. In this study, the investigators will convert the fraction of the night identified as invalid to percentage of the night identified as valid (e.g., when 25% of the night is identified as invalid, this will be converted to 75% of the night identified as valid). Pupils will be included if they have at least 9 valid hours on four days for the sedentary time analysis, and at least 50% valid sleep data for five nights for the sleep duration analysis.
Next to the GENEActiv accelerometer, pupils will complete a questionnaire including items on determinants of reducing and regularly interrupting sedentary time in general (e.g., "I think it is important for my health to reduce my sitting time and to take regular breaks"), in the classroom (e.g., "I would rather sit in class than stand up"), and while making homework (e.g., "I prefer to do my schoolwork sitting down rather than standing up"). All items will be answered using a 5-point Likert scale (e.g., "totally disagree" to "totally agree"). Secondly, the questionnaire will assess adolescents' mental well-being using the World Health Organization-Five Well-Being Index (WHO-5). This scale consists of five statements relating to the past two weeks. Each statement is rated on a 6-point scale, with higher scores indicating better mental well-being.
Enrollment
Sex
Ages
Volunteers
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Primary purpose
Allocation
Interventional model
Masking
600 participants in 3 patient groups
Loading...
Central trial contact
Veerle Van Oeckel; Maïté Verloigne, Prof. dr.
Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov
Clinical trials
Research sites
Resources
Legal