ClinicalTrials.Veeva

Menu

Refinement and Testing of Recruitment Methodology for Behavioral Medication Adherence Interventions Using Behavioral Science-based Approaches (STIC2IT-2)

Mass General Brigham logo

Mass General Brigham

Status

Enrolling

Conditions

Medication Adherence
Diabetes
Pharmacist-Patient Relations

Treatments

Behavioral: 2 phone calls
Behavioral: Control recruitment letter
Behavioral: Behavioral theory-informed recruitment letter (prospect theory)
Behavioral: 4 phone calls
Behavioral: Primer postcard

Study type

Interventional

Funder types

Other
NIH

Identifiers

NCT06569290
5P30AG064199-05 (U.S. NIH Grant/Contract)
2024P002222

Details and patient eligibility

About

The overarching goal of the proposed research is to prepare the clinical pharmacist intervention for sustainable implementation and dissemination. Because the effectiveness of the intervention has already been demonstrated in a NIH Stage Model IV trial, the investigators propose an Effectiveness-Implementation Type 3 Hybrid design, in which the primary focus is on testing different implementation methods, while secondarily observing clinical effects. The investigators' overarching hypothesis is to identify the most impactful elements of a behavioral theory-informed recruitment approach, which can be replicable across clinical settings.

Accordingly, the investigators propose to perform testing of a behaviorally-informed recruitment approaches in a community-based setting. Like the previous Tele-Pharmacy Intervention to Improve Treatment Adherence (STIC2IT) trial (NCT02512276), participants will be English or Spanish speaking adults ≥18 years of age identified through the electronic health record (EHR) as having poor disease control and/or poor medication adherence for diabetes. The primary care physicians of eligible patients identified through the EHR will be contacted to opt-out any patients they wish not to be included. Patients will then be randomized to each of the following conditions, such that there will be 8 total arms: (1) inclusion of a mailer primer (yes/no), (2) the most successful recruitment letter from the preliminary study using prospect theory (versus the control letter), and (3) intensity of the intervention outreach (4 calls vs. 2 calls). The investigators plan to enroll 584 participants who meet the inclusion criteria, with 73 patients per each of the 8 study arms.

Patients across all arms who agree to be scheduled will receive an appointment with one of the clinical pharmacists within the established BMC pharmacist program. The primary outcome will be completion of a clinical pharmacist appointment within 8 weeks after randomization. Key secondary outcomes will include scheduled visit rates, no-show rates for scheduled appointments, medication adherence over the 3-month follow-up, and clinical outcomes, including HbA1c levels measured using EHR data in the 3 months after randomization. The medication adherence and clinical outcomes will be used for the Aim 2 evaluation.

Enrollment

584 estimated patients

Sex

All

Ages

18+ years old

Volunteers

No Healthy Volunteers

Inclusion criteria

  • ≥18 years of age
  • English or Spanish speaking
  • Receiving care from a BMC primary care provider
  • Non-adherent to prescribed oral glucose-lowering medications as per pharmacy dispense records (proportion of days covered <80% to at least one eligible medication in last 6 months)
  • Evidence of poor or worsening disease control

Exclusion criteria

  • Evidence of terminal conditions

Trial design

Primary purpose

Health Services Research

Allocation

Randomized

Interventional model

Factorial Assignment

Masking

Double Blind

584 participants in 8 patient groups

Arm 1
Active Comparator group
Description:
Post card; control letter; 2 calls
Treatment:
Behavioral: Primer postcard
Behavioral: 2 phone calls
Behavioral: Control recruitment letter
Arm 2
Active Comparator group
Description:
Post card; control letter; 4 calls
Treatment:
Behavioral: Primer postcard
Behavioral: 4 phone calls
Behavioral: Control recruitment letter
Arm 3
Active Comparator group
Description:
Post card; behavioral letter; 2 calls
Treatment:
Behavioral: Primer postcard
Behavioral: Behavioral theory-informed recruitment letter (prospect theory)
Behavioral: 2 phone calls
Arm 4
Active Comparator group
Description:
Post card; behavioral letter; 4 calls
Treatment:
Behavioral: Primer postcard
Behavioral: 4 phone calls
Behavioral: Behavioral theory-informed recruitment letter (prospect theory)
Arm 5
Active Comparator group
Description:
No post card; control letter; 2 calls
Treatment:
Behavioral: 2 phone calls
Behavioral: Control recruitment letter
Arm 6
Active Comparator group
Description:
No post card; control letter; 4 calls
Treatment:
Behavioral: 4 phone calls
Behavioral: Control recruitment letter
Arm 7
Active Comparator group
Description:
No post card; behavioral letter; 2 calls
Treatment:
Behavioral: Behavioral theory-informed recruitment letter (prospect theory)
Behavioral: 2 phone calls
Arm 8
Active Comparator group
Description:
No post card; behavioral letter; 4 calls
Treatment:
Behavioral: 4 phone calls
Behavioral: Behavioral theory-informed recruitment letter (prospect theory)

Trial contacts and locations

1

Loading...

Central trial contact

Niteesh K Choudhry, MD, PhD; Michael M Fischer, MD, MS

Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov

Clinical trials

Find clinical trialsTrials by location
© Copyright 2026 Veeva Systems