ClinicalTrials.Veeva

Menu

Regional Ventilation During High Flow Nasal Cannula and Conventional Nasal Cannula in Patients With Hypoxia

A

Asan Medical Center

Status

Completed

Conditions

Ventilation
Oxygen Therapy
Hypoxia
High Flow Nasal Cannula

Treatments

Device: HFNC followed by conventional nasal cannula
Device: Conventional nasal cannula followed by HFNC

Study type

Interventional

Funder types

Other

Identifiers

Details and patient eligibility

About

High-flow nasal cannula (HFNC) that uses heated and humidified oxygen was recently introduced for bedside care. It has been shown to be associated with reduced risks of tracheal intubation rates and mortality in adult hypoxic patients.

The mechanisms of the effects of HFNC are thought to be related to the favorable effects of the heated and humidified gas, the high-flow rate used to minimize the entrainment of room air, and an increase in the ventilation efficiency, including the elimination of nasopharyngeal dead space, positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) effects, and improvements in paradoxical abdominal movement. Regarding the effects on lung volume, global ventilation in the lungs increases during HFNC, which is thought to attribute to PEEP effects. However, how regional ventilation is affected during HFNC in comparison with conventional NC remains unknown.

Because PEEP in mechanically ventilated patients improves the regional homogeneity of ventilation, investigators postulated that HFNC via PEEP effects would result in more homogeneous regional distributions in the ventilation changes. Investigators therefore assessed global and regional ventilation in patients with hypoxia receiving care via HFNC using electric impedance tomography and compared these results with conventional nasal cannula.

Enrollment

24 patients

Sex

All

Ages

20+ years old

Volunteers

No Healthy Volunteers

Inclusion criteria

  • Age >20 years
  • Subjective dyspnea in room air
  • SaO2< 90% in room air
  • Oxygen requirement for nasal cannula < 6 L/m

Exclusion criteria

  • Unstable vital signs

    • SBP <90 mmHg
    • DBP < 60 mmHg
    • Heart rate > 120 bpm
    • Respiratory rate > 30 bpm
    • Persistent dyspnea under oxygen therapy using NC
  • Severe hypoxia

    • PaO2/FiO2< 200 mmHg
  • Unable to cooperate

    • Delirium
    • Reduced cognitive function

Trial design

Primary purpose

Treatment

Allocation

Randomized

Interventional model

Crossover Assignment

Masking

None (Open label)

24 participants in 2 patient groups

HFNC first
Active Comparator group
Description:
Patients in "HFNC first" receive oxygen therapy using HFNC in ahead of conventional nasal cannula oxygen therapy. After 20 minutes of HFNC therapy, patients receive conventional nasal cannula oxygen therapy.
Treatment:
Device: HFNC followed by conventional nasal cannula
LFS first
Active Comparator group
Description:
Patients in "LFS first" receive oxygen therapy using conventional nasal cannula in ahead of HFNC therapy. After 20 minutes of conventional nasal cannula oxygen therapy, patients receive HFNC oxygen therapy.
Treatment:
Device: Conventional nasal cannula followed by HFNC

Trial contacts and locations

0

Loading...

Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov

Clinical trials

Find clinical trialsTrials by location
© Copyright 2026 Veeva Systems