Status
Conditions
Treatments
About
This study aimed to determine whether registrar involvement in minimally invasive distal pancreatectomy (MIDP) was associated with adverse outcomes.
Full description
From January 2009 to March 2020, data of all consecutive patients requiring distal pancreatectomy in our public tertiary hospital were prospectively collected and retrospectively analyzed.
Registrars were progressively involved for MIDP since 2009 and their experience was: < 5 open pancreatic resections, < 5 MIDP and at least 30 advanced minimally invasive gastrointestinal resections.
Outcome of patients who underwent either distal pancreatectomy by the consultant or registrars were compared.
Our primary outcome was the conversion rate. The secondary outcomes were 90-days postoperative outcomes including CR-POPF defined and classified according to the 2016 ISGPF definition.
Enrollment
Sex
Ages
Volunteers
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
71 participants in 2 patient groups
Loading...
Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov
Clinical trials
Research sites
Resources
Legal