Status
Conditions
Treatments
About
. 1 Clarify the difference in efficacy of regofinib combined with TACE compared with second-line treatment of advanced liver cancer; 2. To evaluate the safety and prognostic imaging factors of regorofenib in advanced second-line therapy; 3, to explore whether it is necessary to increase the treatment of TACE in the second-line treatment of advanced HCC.
Enrollment
Sex
Ages
Volunteers
Inclusion criteria
( - ) After pathological / clinical diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma or radical resection of hepatocellular carcinoma; ( - ) CNLC Ⅲa Patients with intrahepatic recurrence before (including a); ( - ) Previous failure of first-line systemic treatment; ( - ) Age: 18-75 years old; ( - ) Child-Pugh 7 points; ( - ) ECOG PS Grade 0-2; ( - ) At least one measurable lesion in the liver.
Exclusion criteria
( - ) Known hepatobiliary tubular cell carcinoma and mixed cell carcinoma and fibrolamellar cell carcinoma; ( - ) Previous (within 5 years) or concurrent other incurable malignant tumors; ( - ) Having received local treatment, systemic chemotherapy, radiotherapy other than TACE during the first-line systemic treatment; ( - ) During the second-line systemic treatment, I also received local treatment, systemic chemotherapy, radiotherapy other than TACE; ( - ) Serious uncontrollable systemic and other systemic diseases, such as uremia, cardiovascular and cerebrovascular accidents; ( - ) Allergy to any drug included in the study; ( - ) Pregnant or lactating women;
192 participants in 2 patient groups
Loading...
Central trial contact
WenBo Guo
Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov
Clinical trials
Research sites
Resources
Legal