Status
Conditions
Treatments
About
Hip fractures are common, especially in older adults, and they can have a big impact on health and quality of life. In Australia, hip fractures are a significant healthcare challenge. After surgery, patients often need rehabilitation to regain mobility, but this usually involves long hospital stays. The RITH4Hips trial will determine if a program where patients receive rehabilitation at home (instead of in the hospital) is similar to conventional inpatient rehabilitation.
Objectives:
The main goal of this study is to find out if rehabilitation at home after surgery for a hip fracture works as well as rehabilitation in the hospital. The investigators also want to see if the home rehabilitation program can reduce the time spent in a hospital bed and improve other aspects like quality of life, mobility, and pain management.
Methods:
This study will involve older adults who have had surgery due to a low-trauma hip fracture. Participants will be randomly assigned to either the usual care inpatient rehabilitation or the Rehabilitation in the Home (RITH) program. The investigators will measure outcomes such as how well patients can move, how much pain they experience, how their quality of life improves, and how much time they spend in the hospital.
Expected Outcomes:
The investigators expect that the home rehabilitation program will be just similar to inpatient rehabilitation in helping patients recover mobility. The investigators also hope to find that it will reduce the time patients spend in a hospital bed, improve their quality of life, reduce fear of falling, and lessen the burden on carers. Additionally, the investigators aim to show that the home program is more cost-effective than hospital-based rehabilitation.
Full description
Study Aim This study aims to determine whether a multidisciplinary Rehabilitation in the Home (RITH) program for patients following low-trauma hip fracture (LTHF) is non-inferior to inpatient rehabilitation in terms of mobility during activities of daily living (ADL), assessed using the de Morton Mobility Index (DEMMI)
Study Design This is a pragmatic, multicentre, randomised, single-blinded, parallel-group, non-inferiority clinical trial with an embedded qualitative component.
As part of recruitment monitoring, reasons for declining participation will be recorded for individuals approached but not enrolled.
Hypotheses
The investigators hypothesise that compared to inpatient rehabilitation, the RITH program will be:
Non-inferior in terms of mobility recovery (DEMMI score within 2.9 points). Superior in reducing hospital bed days, with at least a 6-day reduction in physical ward stay.
Superior in improving health-related quality of life, walking ability, fear of falling, opioid consumption, and carer experience.
More cost-effective than usual care. Effective in reducing total length of stay (LOS), provided barriers to rapid transition to RITH are addressed.
Methods
Eligibility is determined perioperatively.
Inclusion criteria
Once cleared for rehabilitation (typically 5-10 days post-surgery), participants will be randomised to:
Intervention Groups
Usual Care Inpatient Rehabilitation (UCIR): Participants will receive care in a rehabilitation ward or subacute hospital, including therapy from a multidisciplinary team. Discharge occurs when they achieve sufficient walking and functional ability, typically within 1-3 weeks. Researchers will collect information about carer visits and associated costs during the stay.
Rehabilitation in the Home (RITH): Participants will receive therapy at home from a multidisciplinary team. Discharge occurs when they achieve sufficient walking and functional ability, typically within 1-3 weeks. Researchers will contact patients about carer-related costs during the program.
Follow-up Assessments:
After completing rehabilitation, researchers will visit participants at home (or in the clinic if preferred) shortly after discharge and again six weeks after their initial hospital admission to assess walking ability, daily activities, confidence, quality of life, pain, and post-surgery challenges. Researchers will also gather information on healthcare visits, costs, and new community services used. If participants have carers, the carers will be invited to complete a voluntary survey about carer experience. Medical records will also be reviewed to understand the care provided over the study period.
Qualitative study:
A purposive sample of patients and their carers who were randomised to the RITH group will be invited to participate in a one-on-one interview some weeks after completing rehabilitation. Additionally, an opportunistic sample of other stakeholders such as clinicians, healthcare managers, and insurers will be invited to participate. The embedded qualitative study seeks to gain insights into why the RITH program was or was not deemed effective for individual participants, as well as how the RITH program may be made more acceptable for future implementation.
Sample size calculation:
A sample of 220 participants (allowing for 7% loss to follow-up) is required to detect:
A 2.9-point between-group difference in DEMMI (non-inferiority margin: 6, SD: 8.9).
A 6-day reduction in hospital bed days (mean 25, SD 17, negative binomial parameter theta = 2.1) with 80% power (α = 0.05).
Analysis plan for primary outcome: The primary outcome will be analysed using an analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) with the 6-week DEMMI score as the dependent variable, and independent variables of group, timepoint, and an interaction between group and timepoint. The 6-week DEMMI will be examined using contrasts of the interaction.
Cost analysis: A cost-effectiveness analysis will be conducted alongside this trial, including both direct and indirect costs.
Analysis plan for qualitative study: Qualitative interviews will be analysed using the Rapid Assessment Process, combining deductive and inductive approaches for efficient thematic analysis.
Enrollment
Sex
Ages
Volunteers
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Primary purpose
Allocation
Interventional model
Masking
220 participants in 2 patient groups
Loading...
Central trial contact
Justine Naylor, BAppSc (Physiotherapy), PhD; Thuy Anh Bui, BSC, GradCert Higher Ed, PhD
Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov
Clinical trials
Research sites
Resources
Legal